Skip to main content

Security report for spektrummedia.com

Spektrum Media · Technology · France

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Spektrum Media is a small French technology company specializing in web software development, mobile applications, and website creation. The company has an established domain since 2008, indicating a mature presence in its niche market. The website content is minimal and primarily in French, targeting businesses and individuals seeking digital solutions. The technical infrastructure includes usage of JavaScript, Google Analytics, and hosting via Amazon AWS DNS services. However, the site lacks advanced SEO optimization and accessibility features. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are important for enhancing domain and web application security. There are no visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, which indicates gaps in compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No contact information or incident response details are provided, limiting transparency and trust. Overall, the website demonstrates a basic digital maturity level with room for improvement in security posture, privacy compliance, and content richness. The absence of critical security issues is positive, but the lack of policies and contact details reduces business credibility and user trust. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy policies, and contact transparency are recommended to enhance the website's professionalism and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spektrummedia.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention spektrummedia.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
508
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
508
Weak passwords
3%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for spektrummedia.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Spektrum Media operates as a service provider in the technology sector, focusing on software development for web and mobile platforms. The company targets a local or niche market in France, catering to clients needing custom digital solutions. The business model is service-oriented, likely generating revenue through project-based contracts. The long domain age suggests stability, but the minimal online presence and lack of detailed business information limit competitive visibility. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website data. The company could benefit from expanding its digital footprint and showcasing trust indicators to improve market positioning.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is basic. HTTPS is implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of DNSSEC leaves the domain vulnerable to DNS spoofing attacks. The lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and cross-site scripting. No privacy or security policies are published, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. No incident response or abuse contact information is provided, which could delay response to security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with clear areas for improvement.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement essential security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the web application.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident response.
  5. Integrate a cookie consent mechanism to inform users and obtain consent for tracking technologies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Spektrum Media
Description
Spektrum Media is a company specializing in web software development, mobile applications, and website creation.
Key services
Web software development, Mobile application development, Website creation
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, AWS DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  2. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly provided on the homepage HTML.
  3. No forms detected in the HTML content.
  4. Minimal metadata and Open Graph tags are present but mostly empty.
  5. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts are used for tracking.
  6. No JSON-LD structured data found.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  8. HTTPS is enabled as indicated by canonical URL and script sources.
  9. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  10. No visible security or incident response policies or contacts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based frontend with asynchronous loading of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts. Hosting is inferred to be on Amazon AWS infrastructure based on DNS servers. The site has basic mobile optimization and accessibility features but lacks advanced SEO metadata and structured data markup. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no optimizations detected. The absence of CMS or frameworks suggests a custom or lightweight implementation. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist in SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spektrummedia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spektrummedia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.