Skip to main content

Security report for speedkom.net

ID.KOM · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ID.KOM is a well-established IT service provider based in Germany with over 30 years of experience specializing in managed IT services, cloud solutions, data center operations, and telecommunications. The company targets medium-sized businesses, offering a comprehensive portfolio including IT outsourcing, managed hosting, VPN access, Microsoft 365 support, and telecommunication services. Their market position is strengthened by a team of over 70 IT professionals and operation of their own ISO 27001 certified data centers in Germany. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and detailed service descriptions.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of speedkom.net. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching speedkom.net

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
70
Security headers
30
Email security
83
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention speedkom.net, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for speedkom.net.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ID.KOM operates as a regional IT system house under the parent company Connexta-Gruppe, focusing on the German SMB market. Their business model revolves around providing end-to-end IT solutions including cloud hosting, IT security, and telecommunication services. The company leverages partnerships with technology vendors such as Microsoft and VMware, as evidenced by displayed logos. The presence of configurators for pentesting, WLAN planning, and IT security checkups indicates a consultative sales approach. The company maintains a moderate digital maturity with a WordPress-based website and SEO tools, supporting lead generation and customer engagement.

Security posture

The company demonstrates a mature security posture with ISO 27001 certification and HTTPS enforced across the website. Use of security and privacy plugins like Borlabs Cookie indicates attention to GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, as well as lack of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident response readiness. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced documentation and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Maintain and regularly audit security certifications and update website content to reflect compliance status.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ID.KOM
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ID.KOM
Description
30 Jahre Erfahrung im Bereich professioneller Informations- und Telekommunikationstechnik.
Key services
IT-Outsourcing, Managed Server & Housing, Access | VPN, Domain | Hosting | Zertifikate, M365 Backup, Hosted Exchange, Managed Cloud Backup, IT-Security, Datenschutz, Server & Storage
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Gravity Forms, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Borlabs Cookie, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Divi Theme Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ISO 27001 certification
  • Use of security and privacy plugins (Borlabs Cookie)
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich for an IT service provider.
  2. Strong focus on managed IT services, cloud, data center, and telecommunication solutions.
  3. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels.
  5. ISO 27001 certification is prominently displayed, indicating commitment to security.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  7. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Borlabs Cookie plugin.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  10. Social media presence limited to Facebook link in structured data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and several plugins including Gravity Forms for form handling and Borlabs Cookie for cookie consent management. The technology stack is modern and widely supported, enabling good SEO and user experience. Performance is moderate with use of caching (WP Rocket) and image optimization. The site is mobile optimized and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Hosting appears to be with Speedkom, a German hosting provider, supporting data sovereignty requirements. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by adding missing security headers and improving accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with speedkom.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review speedkom.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.