Skip to main content

Security report for speedhub.org

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SpeedHub is a technology-focused platform that provides insights into how improvements in page speed can positively impact key business metrics such as revenue, conversions, traffic, SEO traffic, session length, and bounce rate. The website presents data-driven forecasts based on real performance data from over 30 well-known companies, offering businesses actionable intelligence to optimize their web performance and ROI. The platform targets businesses interested in digital performance optimization and leverages modern web technologies including Webflow, Google Analytics, and Finsweet attributes for content management and interactivity. Technically, the website is well-structured with modern JavaScript libraries and asynchronous loading of analytics scripts, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. However, the absence of visible security headers and privacy/cookie policies indicates areas for improvement in security and compliance. The site uses HTTPS with IP anonymization in analytics, reflecting a basic level of security awareness. From a security perspective, the site lacks explicit contact information for incident response, privacy policies, and cookie consent mechanisms, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to a malformed query or privacy protection, which reduces transparency and trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective. Overall, SpeedHub presents a professional and informative web presence with good technical implementation but requires enhancements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparency to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching speedhub.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SpeedHub operates in the technology sector, focusing on web performance analytics and business impact forecasting. Its competitive advantage lies in aggregating and presenting empirical data from reputable companies to demonstrate the ROI of page speed improvements. The business model appears to be informational and consultative, targeting digital marketers, web developers, and business decision-makers aiming to optimize website performance. The platform references multiple case studies and external authoritative sources, indicating a strong partnership ecosystem and credibility within the web performance community. Growth indicators include the use of modern web technologies and integration with popular analytics tools. However, the lack of direct contact information and privacy policies may limit customer engagement and trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and IP anonymization in Google Analytics, which protects user privacy to some extent. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection reduces defense-in-depth. No visible forms or input fields reduce the attack surface, but the lack of a security.txt file or incident response contact information limits the ability to report vulnerabilities. The missing privacy and cookie policies indicate compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is basic and would benefit from implementing recommended headers, transparency documents, and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear contact information for vulnerability reporting and incident response.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing WHOIS data or registrant information if possible, or explain privacy protection rationale.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance with data protection standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Learn how faster page speed can impact the key metrics of your business.
Key services
Page speed impact forecasting, Performance data analysis, Business metric improvement insights
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, noUiSlider, Webflow
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website focuses on the impact of page speed on business metrics with data-driven insights.
  2. No contact information or privacy/cookie policies found on the analyzed page.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or query issues.
  4. Website uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  6. No forms or email addresses detected in the provided content.
  7. Content is professional and business-oriented with no adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS with integration of Finsweet attributes for advanced filtering, sorting, and loading functionalities. It uses noUiSlider for interactive sliders and Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user behavior tracking. The site loads scripts asynchronously to optimize performance and includes meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph and Twitter Cards). The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices. However, no explicit hosting provider information was found. The site performs well with fast loading times and good navigation clarity. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is an opportunity to improve technical security by adding missing HTTP security headers and enhancing privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with speedhub.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review speedhub.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.