Skip to main content

Security report for speedcurve.com

SpeedCurve · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SpeedCurve is a specialized web performance monitoring company offering a SaaS platform that tracks website speed and user experience metrics. Their services include synthetic and real user monitoring, performance budgets, core web vitals tracking, and consulting to build a performance culture. The company targets web developers, SEO professionals, product teams, and management seeking to optimize website performance and business outcomes. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in content, providing clear navigation and comprehensive service descriptions. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, analytics tools like Mixpanel and Google Analytics, and custom performance monitoring scripts. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are missing. WHOIS data is incomplete, which slightly reduces domain trustworthiness. Overall, SpeedCurve presents a credible and professional digital presence with strong business and technical maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching speedcurve.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SpeedCurve operates in the technology sector as a small-sized SaaS provider focused on web performance monitoring and consulting. Their market position is strengthened by a focus on actionable insights and performance culture coaching, differentiating them from generic monitoring tools. The business model relies on subscription services with additional consulting offerings. The company showcases strong trust indicators including client logos, testimonials, and case studies from reputable organizations. Their partnership ecosystem includes scheduling and social platforms like Calendly, LinkedIn, and Bluesky. Growth indicators include continuous feature updates and active content marketing. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled lead capture via forms and scheduled chats.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. Use of asynchronous script loading and modern browser APIs indicates good technical hygiene. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be exploited. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information is published, which limits transparency for security researchers and customers. Cookie consent mechanisms are missing despite use of tracking scripts, which may pose compliance risks under GDPR. No vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the visible code. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by adding security headers, privacy controls, and a formal security disclosure process.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations given the use of tracking technologies.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Improve WHOIS data transparency or verify domain registration details to enhance domain trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SpeedCurve
Description
SpeedCurve provides website performance monitoring services that help track how users experience website speed, identify performance issues, and fix them. They offer coaching and consulting to build a performance culture within organizations.
Key services
Web Performance Monitoring, Performance Budgets, Core Web Vitals Tracking, CI/CD Pipeline Integration, Competitive Benchmarking, Regression Monitoring, Consulting & Support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Mixpanel, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Leadfeeder, PerformanceObserver API, Custom LUX performance monitoring
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async loading for scripts
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Mixpanel, Google Analytics, Leadfeeder
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mixpanel, Leadfeeder
Marketing tools
Mixpanel, Leadfeeder
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Professional design and clear navigation with comprehensive information about services.
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via forms and scheduling links.
  4. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of tracking scripts.
  5. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  7. Strong social proof with client logos and testimonials.
  8. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with JavaScript-based analytics (Mixpanel, Google Analytics) and performance monitoring scripts leveraging browser Performance APIs. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and loads quickly with asynchronous script loading. The HTML and CSS are valid and structured for accessibility and SEO. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Performance is fast, and the site includes rich media and interactive elements without compromising speed. Technical debt appears low, but adding security headers and privacy controls would improve the overall technical robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 69/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with speedcurve.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review speedcurve.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.