Skip to main content

Security report for speakonit.ai

Girls Who Code · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Speak On It is a campaign website hosted on Squarespace, affiliated with Girls Who Code, aimed at empowering girls and nonbinary youth to contribute their perspectives on AI development. The site encourages engagement through a dedicated phone hotline for sharing opinions. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Squarespace CMS, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Google Fonts, with HTTPS and HSTS enabled ensuring good SSL security. However, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts privacy compliance scores. The WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, limiting domain trust verification, though the branding and content align with a reputable non-profit organization. Overall, the site is safe, educational, and well-designed but could improve in privacy transparency and security headers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching speakonit.ai

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a non-profit educational campaign focused on AI ethics and diversity, targeting girls and nonbinary youth. It leverages partnerships such as UCLA research and is part of the Girls Who Code ecosystem. The business model is advocacy and education with no direct commercial transactions. The site’s market position is niche within AI diversity advocacy. The content quality and branding are consistent and professional, supporting trustworthiness. External links and social media profiles reinforce the connection to the parent organization. The lack of detailed business contact information and WHOIS transparency are minor concerns.

Security posture

The site benefits from HTTPS with HSTS enabled, indicating strong SSL configuration. However, it lacks additional security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and incident response contacts reduces compliance maturity. The site uses third-party scripts (Google Tag Manager) which should be regularly audited. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with more comprehensive headers and policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools for vulnerabilities and privacy compliance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and SEO optimization.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Girls Who Code
Description
Speak On It is a campaign by Girls Who Code focused on empowering girls and nonbinary youth to contribute their voices to the future of AI. It highlights the importance of diversity and ethics in AI development and encourages youth to share their opinions via a hotline.
Key services
AI ethics advocacy, Youth engagement via hotline, Educational research dissemination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Typekit Fonts
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a campaign page hosted on Squarespace for Girls Who Code focused on AI and diversity.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information limited to a phone number for texting opinions; no email or physical address provided.
  4. No security or incident response policies visible.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, limiting domain trust verification.
  6. Site uses HTTPS with HSTS enabled, indicating good SSL configuration.
  7. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe and educational.
  9. Site design is modern and mobile optimized but lacks some accessibility and SEO best practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Squarespace, a modern CMS platform, using Google Fonts and Typekit for typography, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and moderate performance. SEO is basic with proper meta tags but could be improved with richer structured data and sitemap inclusion. Accessibility is basic with room for improvement. The hosting provider is Squarespace, which provides reliable infrastructure and SSL. No major technical debt or risks were identified from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with speakonit.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review speakonit.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.