Skip to main content

Security report for sovereign.tech

Sovereign Tech Agency · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sovereign Tech Agency is a German-based organization focused on securing and investing in open digital infrastructure critical for the 21st century economy and society. Their market position is that of a strategic investor and supporter of open source ecosystems, targeting startups, SMEs, and the broader digital infrastructure community in Germany and Europe. The website presents a professional and modern technical infrastructure using modern JavaScript modules, SVG graphics, and privacy-respecting analytics (Fathom). Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers implemented, though explicit privacy and cookie policies are missing. No forms or direct contact information are provided on the main site, limiting direct user engagement. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-designed but could improve privacy compliance and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sovereign.tech

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sovereign.tech, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sovereign.tech right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency operates through multiple programs including a fund for strategic investments, a resilience program for bug bounty and vulnerability management, a fellowship supporting open source maintainers, and a challenge program to foster innovation. Their business model appears to be non-profit or public interest focused, emphasizing ecosystem sustainability and digital sovereignty. The target audience includes open source contributors, startups, and SMEs in Germany and Europe. The organization publishes research and reports, enhancing credibility. No direct revenue streams or commercial services are evident from the site content. The partnership ecosystem includes open source communities and possibly governmental or public sector stakeholders.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. The absence of a security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents a compliance gap. The use of minimal third-party scripts reduces attack surface and privacy risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security policies and contact channels for incident reporting.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general inquiries and data protection officer.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response plan with dedicated contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to foster responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure privacy and security best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sovereign Tech Agency
Description
Investing in the infrastructure of the 21st century. The organization secures open digital infrastructure as the foundation for a future-oriented economy and modern society. It focuses on digital sovereignty, open source ecosystems, and strategic investments in open software components to enhance Germany's and Europe's competitiveness and innovation capacity.
Key services
Sovereign Tech Fund - strategic investments in open software components, Sovereign Tech Resilience - bug bounty and vulnerability prevention, Sovereign Tech Fellowship - support for open source maintainers, Sovereign Tech Challenge - competitions for innovative open source solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES Modules, Fathom Analytics, Vite (build tool), SVG graphics
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries
  • No forms detected that collect sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Fathom Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Fathom Analytics
Marketing tools
Fathom Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Focuses on open source digital infrastructure investment and support
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page
  4. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly linked or found
  5. No forms detected for data collection
  6. Uses minimal external scripts, primarily for analytics
  7. Strong use of SVG logos and graphics for branding
  8. Content is available in English and German (alternate hreflang links)
  9. No signs of suspicious or malicious content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern web technologies including ES modules, SVG for graphics, and a privacy-focused analytics service (Fathom). The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or heavy frameworks detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight implementation. Performance is likely fast due to minimal external dependencies and efficient asset loading. Technical risks are low, but the lack of explicit privacy and security documentation could pose compliance risks. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not disclosed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sovereign.tech. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sovereign.tech.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.