Skip to main content

Security report for sourceforge.net

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website sourceforge.net is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Turnstile security challenge page that requires human verification before access. This prevents retrieval of actual website content, metadata, or business information. The domain is long-established since 1999 and registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC, consistent with the known SourceForge platform, a major technology service for open source software hosting. The technical infrastructure includes Cloudflare security services, indicating a mature security posture, although detailed security policies and headers cannot be assessed due to content blocking. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are visible on the challenge page. The content safety rating is safe with no adult or explicit content detected, but the analysis is limited by the WAF challenge. Overall, the site shows legitimacy and a strong domain history but cannot be fully evaluated until the security challenge is passed.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of sourceforge.net. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sourceforge.net

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sourceforge.net, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
55,968
Employees
2
Customers
55,727
Third parties
239
Weak passwords
14%

Latest record dated 2026-05-12 · 295 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for sourceforge.net.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sourceforge.net2026-05-12
  • –sourceforge.net2025-07-28

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SourceForge.net is a well-known technology platform specializing in open source software hosting and distribution. The domain age and registrar data support its established market position. The business model likely revolves around providing software repository services, downloads, and community engagement for developers and users. The lack of accessible content prevents detailed insights into revenue streams, partnerships, or growth indicators. The presence of Cloudflare security services suggests a focus on protecting the platform from abuse and attacks, which is critical for a high-traffic technology service.

Security posture

The website employs Cloudflare Turnstile as a security mechanism to prevent automated access, indicating a proactive security posture. However, due to the blocking, no detailed security headers or policies are visible. The domain uses HTTPS, but DNSSEC is not enabled. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities are detected from the available data. Incident response contacts, security policies, or certifications are not found on the challenge page. Overall, the security posture appears mature but cannot be fully assessed without access to the main site content.

Recommendations

  1. Provide a publicly accessible page with privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  3. Publish clear security policies and incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.
  4. Ensure that the WAF challenge does not block legitimate users or search engine crawlers to improve SEO and user experience.
  5. Implement structured data and metadata on accessible pages to improve SEO and business intelligence extraction.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Page is a Cloudflare Turnstile challenge page requiring human verification before access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by Cloudflare Turnstile challenge, preventing full content analysis.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the challenge page.
  3. No contact information or business details are present on the challenge page.
  4. WHOIS data indicates a long-established domain with consistent registration details.
  5. Technical stack includes Cloudflare security services and standard web technologies.
  6. No explicit or adult content detected; content safety rating is safe but analysis limited due to blocking.
  7. No security headers or detailed security policies visible due to content blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Cloudflare for security and performance, including the Turnstile CAPTCHA challenge to mitigate automated access. The HTML content is minimal and focused on the challenge interface, with standard CSS and JavaScript. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected from the challenge page. Hosting is via Cloudflare's network, indicating robust infrastructure. Performance and accessibility cannot be assessed due to content blocking. The technical stack is modern but limited in visible scope due to the WAF challenge.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100 +12Medium22 findingsView report
  2. 61/100 −15Medium21 findingsView report
  3. 76/100Low19 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sourceforge.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sourceforge.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.