Skip to main content

Security report for solidwp.com

SolidWP · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SolidWP is a specialized technology company focused on providing WordPress security, backup, and centralized site management plugins. Established since 2014, it positions itself as a leader in the WordPress plugin market with reliable and easy-to-use solutions. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence built on WordPress CMS, utilizing advanced tools such as Kadence Blocks and Yoast SEO Premium for content management and SEO optimization. The technical infrastructure includes reputable third-party services for analytics and marketing, such as Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place; however, there is room for improvement in DNS security and security headers. Privacy compliance is limited due to the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures to align with best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching solidwp.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SolidWP operates in the WordPress plugin sector, targeting WordPress site owners and administrators who require robust security and backup solutions. The business model revolves around software sales and centralized management tools, with a market position as a leader since 2014. The company leverages modern web technologies and SEO tools to maintain competitive advantage. The absence of explicit contact information and privacy policies suggests a potential area for business process improvement. The use of multiple analytics and tracking services indicates an active marketing and user engagement strategy. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries was found in the provided data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status flags that prevent unauthorized domain transfers and updates. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduce the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact channels limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts requires careful privacy management to ensure compliance with regulations such as GDPR.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Add explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident response.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SolidWP
Description
SolidWP— WordPress leader for security, backups, and centralized site management. Reliable, easy to use plugins since 2014.
Key services
WordPress security plugins, Backup solutions, Centralized site management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Kadence Blocks, Yoast SEO Premium, Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads, SearchWP
Frameworks
Kadence Blocks
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and focused on WordPress security and backup solutions.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML content.
  4. Multiple modern tracking and analytics tools are used, but no explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
  5. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided content.
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with Kadence Blocks and Yoast SEO Premium plugin.
  7. Domain WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Kadence Blocks for layout and Yoast SEO Premium for search engine optimization. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS is managed via Cloudflare, indicating a reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site uses multiple analytics and marketing tools, which require proper privacy management. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated libraries in the provided content. The website design is professional and content is well-structured, supporting a positive user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with solidwp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review solidwp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.