Skip to main content

Security report for sokolnespeky.cz

TJ Sokol Nespeky · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TJ Sokol Nespeky operates as a local amateur football club in the Czech Republic, providing community sports engagement through multiple football teams across various age groups. The website serves as a hub for match reports, schedules, league standings, and club news, targeting local players, fans, and community members. The club's market position is that of a small, community-focused sports organization competing in regional leagues. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with the SportsPress Pro plugin, leveraging common web technologies such as jQuery and Google Fonts. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and performance, with basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response contacts. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the website content and structure indicate a legitimate local sports club. Overall, the site is functional, informative, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sokolnespeky.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The club's business model is non-profit and community-oriented, focusing on organizing football activities and disseminating information to its members and supporters. The website reflects active engagement with detailed match reports, archives, and league tables, indicating a well-maintained digital presence. Partnerships with regional football associations and use of third-party sports data platforms suggest integration within the local sports ecosystem. The target customer segments are local athletes, families, and football enthusiasts. Growth indicators include regular content updates and active social media presence on Facebook. The club's operations appear stable but limited to local scale without commercial revenue streams evident on the site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism in place, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published security or incident response policy indicate room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The site does not provide a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could enhance transparency and incident handling readiness. Overall, the security posture is sufficient for a small community site but should be enhanced to mitigate risks and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness for security events.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities from outdated software.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TJ Sokol Nespeky
Description
TJ Sokol Nespeky is a local sports club focused on football (soccer) activities, including multiple teams such as A-tým, B-tým, youth teams (U19, U15, U13, U11, U9), and Stará garda. The website provides news, match reports, schedules, archives, and contact information related to the club's activities.
Key services
Football team management, Match scheduling and reporting, Community sports engagement, Information dissemination about club activities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, SportsPress Pro plugin, Google Fonts, Google Calendar embed
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based sports club site with active content and match updates.
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust assessment.
  3. Cookie consent banner present and privacy policy linked.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  6. No evident advertising or tracking services detected.
  7. Site uses HTTPS and loads external resources from trusted domains.
  8. Content is in Czech language focused on local football activities.
  9. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the SportsPress Pro plugin for sports event and league management. It uses jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. The site loads external resources from trusted domains and embeds a Google Calendar for event scheduling. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and the site is mobile responsive. However, there is no evidence of advanced frameworks or hosting provider details. The site could benefit from improved accessibility and SEO practices. No critical technical debt or risks were identified, but security enhancements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sokolnespeky.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sokolnespeky.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.