Skip to main content

Security report for slonk.ing

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Rain's slonksite' is a personal portfolio and blog site for an individual developer and cybersecurity enthusiast known as Rain or slonkazoid. The site showcases the developer's skills, projects, and interests, with a focus on backend web development, cybersecurity, and various programming languages including Rust and Bash. The site also offers software commissions for small projects such as webapps, bots, and mods. The target audience includes fellow developers, cybersecurity professionals, and potential clients seeking software development services. Technically, the website is a static HTML site with no JavaScript, emphasizing simplicity, accessibility, and security. The tech stack described includes modern and secure technologies such as Rust, Axum, Tokio, and PostgreSQL, running on Linux-based systems. The site is optimized for performance and accessibility, with a fast loading time and good mobile optimization. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly stated. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as the use of SSH and PGP keys for identity verification and encrypted filesystems on the server. However, no explicit security headers or HTTPS enforcement details were found in the provided data. There is no published privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service, which limits privacy compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which could be improved to enhance trust and security posture. Overall, the website is a well-maintained personal developer site with a moderate security posture and good technical implementation. The lack of formal privacy and security policies and absence of security headers are areas for improvement. The site is safe for general audiences, contains no adult or explicit content, and is fully accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching slonk.ing

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention slonk.ing, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for slonk.ing right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business represented by this website is a small-scale personal freelance operation focused on software development and cybersecurity. The developer leverages a broad skill set across multiple programming languages and platforms, targeting niche markets such as backend web development, bot creation, and Minecraft modding. The business model is service-oriented, offering commissions for small projects rather than large-scale enterprise solutions. The presence of open source projects and active blogging indicates a community engagement and continuous learning approach. The extensive network of linked domains suggests a well-connected ecosystem within the developer and open source communities. However, there is no indication of formal business registration, VAT, or corporate structure, consistent with a personal brand rather than a corporate entity.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate. The absence of JavaScript reduces the attack surface, and the use of modern, memory-safe languages like Rust is a positive indicator. The server environment uses encrypted filesystems and containerization, which enhances security. However, the lack of visible HTTPS enforcement and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS are notable gaps. No formal security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism is published, which limits transparency and preparedness. The detailed contact information and use of cryptographic keys for identity verification are strengths. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing standard web security headers, HTTPS enforcement, and publishing security-related policies to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strong TLS configuration and enforce it site-wide.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal website of Rain (aka slonkazoid), a software developer and cybersecurity enthusiast specializing in backend web development, malware analysis, and various programming languages. Offers software commissions for websites, webapps, bots, and mods.
Key services
Backend web development, CLI and GUI desktop apps, Discord, Minecraft, WhatsApp bots, Minecraft mods, Software commissions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Rust, Bash, JavaScript/TypeScript, C#, Go, Java, Python, Brainfuck, PHP, Lua, PostgreSQL, Lighttpd, Linux (arm64 and x86_64), Btrfs, LUKS, LineageOS
Frameworks
Axum, Tokio, Askama
Platforms
Linux, Debian, Fedora, Android (LineageOS)
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No JavaScript on main page to reduce attack surface
  • Use of SSH and PGP keys for identity verification
  • Encrypted filesystem on server (LUKS+btrfs)
  • Use of modern secure programming languages (Rust)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal portfolio and blog of a software developer named Rain (slonkazoid).
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is detailed and includes multiple communication channels.
  4. No security policy or incident response information is published.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected; no advertising or marketing tools present.
  6. Website is static with no JavaScript, enhancing security and accessibility.
  7. Technical stack is modern and focused on Rust and Linux-based systems.
  8. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built as a static HTML site with no JavaScript, which enhances security and accessibility. The technical stack described includes modern Rust-based web frameworks (Axum, Tokio) and PostgreSQL with SQLx for database interaction. The hosting environment is Linux-based with encrypted filesystems and containerization, indicating a mature and secure infrastructure. Performance is likely fast due to the static nature and lightweight web server (lighttpd). SEO optimization is basic but present through meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is good, with semantic HTML and no reliance on client-side scripting. There is no CMS detected, which reduces complexity but limits dynamic content management. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with opportunities for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with slonk.ing. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review slonk.ing.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.