Skip to main content

Security report for slater.app

Edgar Allan · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Slater.app is a technology company offering an AI-powered custom code tool designed specifically for Webflow projects. The platform targets Webflow developers and designers who want to enhance their projects with custom scripting without leaving the Webflow environment. The business operates on a SaaS subscription model with free trials, positioning itself as a niche player in the Webflow ecosystem with a focus on AI-assisted coding and team collaboration. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS and hosted on AWS infrastructure, utilizing modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and Stripe for payments. However, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support, which is a critical security shortfall. Security headers are mostly implemented, but the absence of HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms reduces overall security and privacy compliance. The site includes privacy and terms of service pages but lacks explicit contact information and incident response details. Overall, the website is professionally designed with good content quality and moderate trust indicators, but the security posture requires urgent improvement to meet industry standards.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of slater.app. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching slater.app

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
50
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
43
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention slater.app, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
9
Employees
0
Customers
9
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for slater.app.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Slater.app occupies a specialized niche in the Webflow development market by integrating AI-powered custom code generation directly into the Webflow workflow. This gives it a competitive advantage over generic code editors or AI tools that are not Webflow-specific. The business model relies on SaaS subscriptions with free trials to attract users. The presence of testimonials from recognized Webflow developers and integration with affiliate marketing tools like Rewardful indicates an active community engagement and growth strategy. The company behind Slater.app is Edgar Allan, with no detected subsidiaries or parent companies. The platform leverages third-party services such as Mailgun for email and Stripe for payments, indicating a reliance on established service providers. The lack of explicit contact information and security policies may impact customer trust and compliance with regulations like GDPR. The company should consider enhancing transparency and security to strengthen its market position.

Security posture

The current security posture of Slater.app is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which is a fundamental requirement for secure web communication. While several security headers are present, including X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options, the lack of TLS protocols and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No cookie consent mechanism or detailed privacy compliance indicators were found, which may expose the company to regulatory risks. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are not publicly available, limiting the ability to respond effectively to security incidents. The site uses HttpOnly and SameSite cookie flags, which is a positive practice. Overall, the security score is low, and immediate action is recommended to obtain and configure SSL/TLS certificates, enable HTTPS, and implement comprehensive privacy and security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce secure connections.
  3. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  4. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
  5. Regularly audit and update security headers and enable OCSP stapling and session resumption.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and hosted on AWS infrastructure, leveraging modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager for analytics and Stripe for payment processing. The use of Rewardful indicates an affiliate marketing program. The site loads various JavaScript libraries including jQuery and WebFont Loader, and embeds YouTube videos for content. Performance metrics are missing or zero, indicating incomplete data or monitoring. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the lack of HTTPS and SSL certificate is a critical technical risk. The DNS setup is standard with AWS nameservers and valid SPF records for email. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires urgent security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100Medium31 findingsView report
  2. 60/100 +4Medium31 findingsView report
  3. 56/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with slater.app. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review slater.app.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.