Skip to main content

Security report for slater.app

Edgar Allan · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Slater.app is a technology-focused SaaS platform offering an AI-powered custom code tool designed specifically for Webflow projects. The company, Edgar Allan, positions itself as a productivity enhancer for Webflow developers and designers by providing seamless AI integration to generate and manage custom code without character limits. The platform supports collaboration and aims to reduce development time with AI assistance. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS and hosting, utilizing modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager for analytics and Stripe for payment processing. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and CSRF tokens present, though it lacks explicit security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are areas for improvement. Privacy and terms of service pages are available, but GDPR compliance could be enhanced with better cookie management. Overall, the domain registration is consistent with the business claims, and the site shows no signs of malicious or suspicious activity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching slater.app

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention slater.app, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
9
Employees
0
Customers
9
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for slater.app.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Slater.app operates in the niche market of AI-assisted web development tools tailored for Webflow users. Its competitive advantage lies in integrating AI directly into the Webflow environment, enabling users to write and manage custom JavaScript code efficiently. The business model is subscription-based with free trials, targeting small to medium-sized teams and individual developers. The company leverages social proof through verified testimonials on Twitter and maintains a partnership with slater.ck.page for email marketing and user acquisition. Growth indicators include active community engagement and continuous feature development. The company maintains a focused product offering with clear market positioning as a productivity tool for Webflow professionals.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and CSRF tokens are implemented, indicating awareness of common web security practices. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks a published security policy or incident response contact, which are important for transparency and trust. GDPR compliance is partial due to missing cookie consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure policies are not evident, suggesting room for improvement in security governance and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a clear cookie consent banner and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide incident response contact information to build trust and facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards, improving usability for all users and compliance with accessibility regulations.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included and maintain a secure technology stack.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Edgar Allan
Description
Slater is a modern coding environment with an inbuilt AI tool that enables users to get custom code quickly with no character limits, specifically designed for Webflow projects.
Key services
AI-powered custom code generation, Collaboration tools for teams, Code explanation and editing, Integration with Webflow projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Stripe (payment processing), Aeo.press (AI chat integration), jQuery 3.5.1, Custom JavaScript modules
Frameworks
Webflow CMS and hosting platform
Platforms
Webflow hosting, YouTube (embedded video content)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CSRF tokens in meta tags

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Marketing tools
Email marketing via slater.ck.page
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on AI-powered custom code tools for Webflow users.
  3. Strong social proof via multiple verified Twitter testimonials.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  5. Privacy and terms pages are present but cookie consent is missing.
  6. Security headers are not explicitly detected in the HTML content.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and integrations.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging its CMS and hosting capabilities. It uses modern front-end technologies including Google Fonts, jQuery 3.5.1, and custom JavaScript modules loaded as ES modules. Analytics are implemented via Google Tag Manager, and payment processing is integrated through Stripe. The site includes embedded YouTube video content and an AI chat widget powered by aeo.press. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The technical implementation is clean with proper meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph and Twitter Cards). However, the lack of explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy compliance areas. Overall, the infrastructure is modern and well-maintained but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100 +4Medium31 findingsView report
  2. 56/100 −2Medium25 findingsView report
  3. 58/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with slater.app. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review slater.app.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.