Skip to main content

Security report for site-analyzer.com

Site Analyzer · Technology · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Site Analyzer is a medium-sized technology company founded in 2015, specializing in providing a comprehensive suite of SEO tools including rank tracking, crawl analysis, backlinks monitoring, page analysis, and keyword research. The company targets SEO professionals, digital marketers, and web agencies, offering a SaaS subscription model with a 14-day free trial. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, supporting a good user experience and trustworthiness. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and jQuery, integrates Google Analytics and Crisp Chat for analytics and customer support, and enforces HTTPS for secure communications. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the presence of physical offices and contact information supports business credibility. Security posture is solid but could be improved by adding security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is functional, secure, and business credible but requires verification of domain registration and enhanced privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching site-analyzer.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention site-analyzer.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
8,946
Employees
0
Customers
8,946
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
13%

6 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for site-analyzer.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Site Analyzer holds a competitive position in the SEO tools market with over 400,000 users and a broad feature set that consolidates multiple SEO functions into one platform. Its business model relies on SaaS subscriptions, targeting professionals seeking efficiency and trusted data. The company maintains offices in France and the US, indicating international reach. The partnership with Cocolyze, a project-based SEO tool, suggests strategic expansion and ecosystem development. The website's marketing approach includes testimonials, social media engagement, and a free trial to attract and retain customers. The lack of visible certifications or security policies indicates room for maturity in compliance and trust-building. Overall, the company demonstrates solid market presence with growth potential through partnerships and enhanced security practices.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms with anti-CSRF tokens, reflecting good baseline security practices. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but lacking a cookie consent mechanism. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are not found, which could hinder timely handling of security incidents. The missing WHOIS data is a significant concern for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the security posture is good but can be improved by implementing recommended headers, cookie consent, and formal security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and consider adding a security.txt file.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to enhance trust and legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Site Analyzer
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Site Analyzer
Description
Site-Analyzer offers a variety of SEO tools to improve your online visibility and to become an expert in website optimization.
Key services
Rank Tracking, Crawl, Backlinks analysis, Page Analysis, Keyword Research, SEO Benchmark, Site vs. site comparison, White label reports
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 3.3.5, jQuery 2.1.4, FontAwesome, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Crisp Chat
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with CSRF tokens (hidden token fields)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-957594574)
Marketing tools
Crisp Chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. WHOIS data is missing or domain not registered, which is a critical concern
  4. Strong SEO and marketing focus with multiple tools offered
  5. Good presence of contact info and social media links
  6. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner detected
  7. Security headers not visible in provided data
  8. Use of modern JS libraries and frameworks
  9. Multiple offices with physical addresses listed
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a stable and widely adopted technology stack including Bootstrap 3.3.5, jQuery 2.1.4, and FontAwesome for UI components and icons. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, and Crisp Chat for customer support. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO optimization including meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not available from the data. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with site-analyzer.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review site-analyzer.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.