Skip to main content

Security report for singular.net

Singular · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Singular operates as a leading marketing analytics and attribution platform, providing businesses with tools to unify marketing data, measure campaign performance, and optimize advertising spend. The company targets marketing professionals and enterprises seeking advanced analytics solutions. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content about their services. Technically, the site leverages modern marketing and analytics technologies including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, HubSpot, and Bing Ads, integrated within a WordPress CMS environment enhanced by Yoast SEO for search optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and security headers present, though explicit security policies and incident response details are absent. Privacy compliance is well addressed with visible privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises questions about domain legitimacy, warranting further verification. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism and technical maturity, supporting its market position as a leader in marketing analytics.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of singular.net. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching singular.net

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Singular's market positioning as a leader in marketing analytics is supported by its comprehensive service offerings including data unification, attribution modeling, and campaign measurement. The business model is B2B SaaS, focusing on enterprises and marketing professionals. The company benefits from a robust partnership ecosystem, integrating with major analytics and advertising platforms. Growth indicators include extensive use of tracking technologies and marketing tools. The website content and branding are consistent, reinforcing trust and credibility. Revenue streams likely derive from subscription-based services. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified from the data. The company maintains a strong digital footprint with active social media presence on LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options, indicating adherence to security best practices. The presence of cookie consent mechanisms aligns with privacy regulations like GDPR. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program represents a gap in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The security score is good but could be improved by publishing explicit security documentation and establishing a formal vulnerability disclosure channel.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response information on the website to enhance transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Provide contact details for a Data Protection Officer or security contact to improve compliance and communication.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  5. Continue to monitor and update third-party scripts and tracking technologies to mitigate potential security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Singular
Description
Singular is a marketing analytics and attribution platform that helps businesses unify their marketing data, measure performance, and optimize campaigns.
Key services
Marketing data unification, Attribution modeling, Campaign performance measurement, Analytics dashboards
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, HubSpot, Bing Ads, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, WordPress
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Bing Ads, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics, Hotjar
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or domain not registered according to raw WHOIS output.
  4. Strong marketing analytics focus with multiple integrations and tracking technologies.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  8. No company phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML content.
  9. Contact form and email contact present but no explicit email addresses extracted.
  10. Website uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and SEO-optimized infrastructure. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics technologies including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, HubSpot, Bing Ads, and Hotjar, demonstrating a sophisticated data collection and marketing stack. Performance is fast with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site uses preconnect and preload hints to optimize resource loading. No technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details were not identified. Overall, the technical implementation supports a high-quality user experience and effective marketing analytics capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100 +1Medium31 findingsView report
  2. 68/100Medium33 findingsView report
  3. 75/100Medium25 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with singular.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review singular.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.