Skip to main content

Security report for shoprunner.com

ShopRunner · E-commerce · N/a

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ShopRunner operates as a membership-based e-commerce platform providing users with access to free signup accounts that unlock deals and fast shipping across a wide range of retail categories including fashion, electronics, health, and beauty. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and targets online shoppers seeking convenience and savings. The business model leverages partnerships with multiple retail stores to offer value to its members. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks such as React and integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, TikTok Analytics, Branch.io, and Facebook Pixel. The site is served over HTTPS with asynchronous script loading to optimize performance. However, some accessibility features and security headers are not clearly present, indicating areas for technical improvement. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML content. The absence of visible security headers and lack of explicit cookie consent mechanisms suggest room for enhancement in security best practices and privacy compliance. The WHOIS data is notably missing, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency but does not directly impact the operational security posture. Overall, ShopRunner presents a solid e-commerce platform with good user experience and technical maturity. The primary risks relate to domain registration opacity and incomplete privacy compliance features. Strategic improvements in security headers, cookie consent, and WHOIS transparency would strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of shoprunner.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 29 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching shoprunner.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
70
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention shoprunner.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
25,012
Employees
5
Customers
24,956
Third parties
51
Weak passwords
5%

Latest record dated 2026-05-15 · 28 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for shoprunner.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –activate-stg.shoprunner.com2026-05-15
  • –activate-stg.shoprunner.com2025-10-31
  • –activate-stg.shoprunner.com2025-07-25
  • –activate-stg.shoprunner.com2025-07-20
  • –activate-stg.shoprunner.com2025-04-15

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ShopRunner holds a strong position in the e-commerce sector by providing a membership model that aggregates deals and fast shipping options across diverse retail categories. Its competitive advantage lies in the breadth of retail partnerships and the value proposition of free signup with expedited shipping. The business model likely generates revenue through partnerships and possibly affiliate commissions. Target customers are value-conscious online shoppers. The presence of multiple marketing and analytics tools indicates a data-driven approach to customer acquisition and retention. The lack of explicit contact information and domain registration transparency may be a strategic choice to protect business privacy but could impact customer trust. Growth indicators include recent privacy policy updates and active social media presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is publicly available, which may hinder coordinated security incident handling. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risk. Overall, the security posture is functional but could benefit from enhanced header policies, transparency in security practices, and improved privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Deploy a clear cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to foster transparency and enable responsible reporting.
  4. Improve WHOIS registration transparency to enhance domain legitimacy and customer confidence.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ShopRunner
Description
ShopRunner is an e-commerce platform offering free signup accounts that provide access to online shopping deals across various categories including clothing, accessories, health, beauty, electronics, and more.
Key services
Free signup account, Online shopping deals, Access to multiple retail stores
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, TikTok Analytics, Branch.io, Salesforce Embedded Messaging
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, TikTok Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TikTok Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Branch.io, Movable Ink
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Privacy policy is present and recently updated.
  4. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage.
  6. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts are used.
  7. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and asynchronous loading.
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages found.
  10. Branding and design are consistent and professional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React framework with asynchronous loading of JavaScript bundles and integration of multiple analytics and marketing services. The use of Google Tag Manager, TikTok Analytics, Branch.io, and Salesforce Embedded Messaging indicates a sophisticated marketing and customer engagement infrastructure. Performance is moderate with optimizations such as deferred script loading. However, the lack of detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform. No hosting provider information is evident from the data. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in accessibility and security header implementation are recommended to reduce risk and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 83/100Low22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with shoprunner.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review shoprunner.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.