Skip to main content

Security report for shoprunner.com

ShopRunner · E-commerce · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ShopRunner operates as an e-commerce platform providing membership-based shopping benefits across a wide range of product categories. The website targets online shoppers seeking deals and fast shipping options. The platform leverages modern web technologies including React and JavaScript frameworks, with integration of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site demonstrates good design quality and user experience with clear navigation and mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking visible security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data reduces trust slightly but the professional branding and presence of privacy and terms policies support legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and business credible but could improve in transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching shoprunner.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention shoprunner.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
25,012
Employees
5
Customers
24,956
Third parties
51
Weak passwords
5%

Latest record dated 2026-05-15 · 28 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for shoprunner.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –activate-stg.shoprunner.com2026-05-15
  • –activate-stg.shoprunner.com2025-10-31
  • –activate-stg.shoprunner.com2025-07-25
  • –activate-stg.shoprunner.com2025-07-20
  • –activate-stg.shoprunner.com2025-04-15

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ShopRunner positions itself in the competitive e-commerce market by offering a membership model that aggregates deals and benefits across multiple retail categories. Its business model focuses on enhancing the online shopping experience through partnerships and curated deals. The company targets a broad audience of online consumers and maintains a consistent brand presence. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data suggests privacy protection or recent domain registration, which is somewhat unusual for established e-commerce businesses. The platform uses standard marketing and analytics tools to track user engagement and optimize offerings. No direct contact information or detailed business registration data is publicly visible, which may impact customer trust and support accessibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks visible HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is found, indicating limited transparency in security incident handling. The site does not display cookie consent mechanisms, which may affect GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced header implementation, explicit privacy controls, and published security policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve privacy compliance.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  4. Improve accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Increase visibility of verified company contact information to strengthen business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ShopRunner
Description
ShopRunner is an e-commerce platform offering free signup accounts for online shopping across multiple categories including clothing, accessories, health, beauty, electronics, and more.
Key services
Online shopping, Deals and discounts, Membership benefits
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript, Webpack, FedExSans font, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main page HTML.
  3. Privacy policy and terms of service are present and linked.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and fonts.
  6. Social media verification tags present for Facebook and Twitter.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  8. No visible security headers in HTML source; actual HTTP headers unknown.
  9. No WHOIS data available from public registry, which is unusual.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern front-end technologies such as React and Webpack, with asynchronous loading of scripts and fonts optimized for performance. The use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel indicates integration of advanced analytics and marketing tools. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. However, the absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading but could be improved with further optimization. No hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML content. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 79/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with shoprunner.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review shoprunner.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.