Skip to main content

Security report for shk-aschaffenburg.de

SHK Innung Aschaffenburg–Miltenberg · Other · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SHK Innung Aschaffenburg–Miltenberg operates as a regional professional guild specializing in sanitary, heating, and air conditioning services within the Aschaffenburg and Miltenberg regions of Germany. The website serves as an information portal and member resource, providing industry news, contact details, and regulatory compliance information. The business model focuses on supporting local professionals and companies in the sector, positioning itself as a trusted regional association. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, utilizing common plugins such as Real Cookie Banner for privacy compliance and Bold Page Builder for content management. The site is hosted via DomainControl (GoDaddy), employs HTTPS, and demonstrates moderate performance with good mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility are adequately addressed, though some improvements in security headers could enhance the technical posture. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response information suggests room for maturity in security governance. Overall, the site maintains a good security posture suitable for its business scope. The overall risk assessment indicates a low risk profile with strong compliance and trust indicators. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, formalizing incident response procedures, and maintaining regular updates to WordPress and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching shk-aschaffenburg.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
60
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The SHK Innung Aschaffenburg–Miltenberg holds a niche position as a regional professional guild, catering to sanitary, heating, and air conditioning professionals. Its competitive advantage lies in localized expertise and member-focused services. The business model is association-based, relying on membership and industry representation rather than direct commercial sales. Target customers include local contractors, service providers, and end customers seeking qualified professionals. Growth indicators are not explicitly stated but the maintained online presence and compliance suggest stable operations. The partnership ecosystem is limited to hosting and plugin providers, with no evident commercial partnerships. Strategic observations highlight the importance of digital presence for member engagement and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement and GDPR-compliant cookie consent. No immediate vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Compliance gaps include the lack of a published security policy and incident response plan, which are recommended for enhanced governance. Data protection practices are aligned with GDPR, supported by comprehensive privacy policies. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing information. The security culture appears basic but adequate for the business scale. Recommendations focus on improving security headers, documenting security policies, and conducting regular security audits.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to enforce HTTPS.
  5. Enhance user trust by adding security certifications or trust badges.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SHK Innung Aschaffenburg–Miltenberg
Description
The website represents the SHK Innung Aschaffenburg–Miltenberg, a professional guild or association related to sanitary, heating, and air conditioning services in the Aschaffenburg and Miltenberg regions in Germany.
Key services
Industry representation, Information dissemination, Member support, Event organization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Real Cookie Banner plugin, Bold Page Builder plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies are implemented.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided and verified.
  4. No security policy or incident response information found.
  5. No evidence of advertising or tracking beyond cookie consent.
  6. Website uses WordPress with common plugins and appears professionally maintained.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
  8. WHOIS data is consistent and domain appears legitimate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a standard WordPress platform with common plugins for cookie consent and page building. The hosting provider is DomainControl (GoDaddy), a reputable service. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags. Technical debt is minimal but could be reduced by removing unused plugins or scripts. Modernization opportunities include adopting advanced security headers and improving accessibility features. Technical risks are low but depend on maintaining timely updates and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with shk-aschaffenburg.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review shk-aschaffenburg.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.