Skip to main content

Security report for sharesecurely.com

Altvia Solutions, LLC · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Altvia Solutions, LLC is a technology company specializing in providing SaaS platforms and solutions tailored for private capital markets, including private equity, venture capital, and related investment sectors. Their platform offers CRM, virtual data rooms, analytics, and AI-powered tools to streamline capital raising and investor relations workflows. The company has a mature market presence with a domain registered since 2003 and targets investment professionals and fund managers. The website is built on WordPress and integrates multiple marketing and analytics technologies, reflecting a modern digital infrastructure. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and domain protections in place, though there is room for improvement in security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, though the specific URL analyzed returns a 404 error page, indicating a missing or moved resource.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sharesecurely.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
20
Email security
88
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Altvia operates in the niche of private capital technology, serving a specialized B2B market. Their competitive advantage lies in an integrated platform combining CRM, data rooms, analytics, and AI capabilities. The business model is subscription-based SaaS targeting private equity firms, venture capitalists, and family offices. The company demonstrates growth through content marketing, resource libraries, and industry-specific workflows. Partnerships and integrations with marketing and analytics providers enhance their ecosystem. The absence of direct contact information on the analyzed page suggests a focus on lead generation through demos and resource engagement. The company maintains a consistent brand and professional online presence, supporting credibility in a competitive market.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is solid with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited statuses. However, no security headers were detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. The extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts indicates a high level of user tracking, which is managed with a cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR. Overall, the site demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity but would benefit from enhanced security headers, published policies, and a vulnerability disclosure program.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Conduct an accessibility audit and improve compliance to enhance user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Altvia Solutions, LLC
Description
Altvia provides a platform and solutions focused on private capital teams including private equity, venture capital, fund of funds, real estate funds, hedge funds, and family offices. Their offerings include CRM, VDR & LP Portal, Analytics, and AI-powered tools.
Key services
CRM, VDR and LP Portal, Analytics, AI-powered tools (AIMe)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Analytics, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, 6sense, Bing UET, Bugherd
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Squarespace Domains (Registrar), Google Cloud DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientDeleteProhibited and ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing UET, 6sense, Clearbit, G2 Crowd
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Twitter Ads, Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot Analytics, Hotjar, 6sense, Clearbit, G2 Crowd, Bugherd
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Clearbit, 6sense
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. The URL https://altvia.com/sharesecure/ returns a 404 Page Not Found error page.
  2. Despite the 404 error, the website's main domain and other pages are accessible and professional.
  3. The site uses multiple modern marketing and analytics tools.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented with clear user options.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on this page.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published on this page.
  7. The site is built on WordPress and uses common JavaScript libraries and tracking scripts.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; potential area for improvement.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  10. Social media presence includes LinkedIn and YouTube links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS and uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Slick Carousel, and multiple marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and 6sense. The domain is registered with Squarespace Domains and uses Google Cloud DNS servers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site includes a cookie consent mechanism and integrates various tracking pixels for marketing and analytics. The 404 error on the specific URL indicates a missing resource but does not affect the overall site quality. Technical risks include lack of security headers and potential over-reliance on third-party scripts which may impact privacy and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sharesecurely.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sharesecurely.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.