Skip to main content

Security report for sharedo.com

Sharedo · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sharedo is a mature and reputable provider of legal case and matter management software, primarily targeting large law firms and legal departments. The company offers a cloud-based platform designed to improve operational efficiency, profitability, and client experience. As part of Clio, Sharedo benefits from a strong parent company relationship, enhancing its market position. The website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging modern analytics and marketing tools, hosted on Azure DNS infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, domain protections in place, and a dedicated security page, though DNSSEC is not enabled. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the website and business present a low risk profile with high trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sharedo.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sharedo.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sharedo.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sharedo operates in the technology sector, specifically legal software SaaS, with a focus on large law firms. Its business model revolves around subscription-based cloud software, offering extensive features including case management, document handling, workflow automation, and financial management. The company leverages partnerships and a strong customer base, including well-known law firms, to maintain competitive advantage. The parent company Clio provides additional market strength. The website content and structure support lead generation and customer engagement through demos, case studies, and educational resources. Marketing and analytics tools are integrated to optimize customer acquisition and retention.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain status flags preventing unauthorized changes. A dedicated security page outlines policies, though no explicit incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure programs are published. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces moderate tracking but is managed with cookie consent. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing incident response contacts, and adding a security.txt file to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture supports business continuity and customer trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish explicit incident response and abuse contact information on the website.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet compliance standards.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sharedo
Description
Sharedo is a legal case and matter management software platform designed to streamline operations, enhance productivity, and drive efficiencies for law firms and legal departments. It offers cloud-based case management tailored to large law firms, enabling management of cases with improved profitability and client experience.
Key services
Work Management, Work Collaboration, Email Management, Document Management, Document Production, Business Intelligence, Data-load & Migration, Personas & Client Portals, Work-type Modeller, Workflow Automation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Swiper.js, HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientDeleteProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Security page detailing policies

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics, Bing Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics via GTM, HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and targeted at large law firms.
  3. Strong presence of trust indicators including customer logos and case studies.
  4. Security and privacy policies are clearly presented with consent mechanisms.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No signs of suspicious or malicious activity detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Elementor page builder, supported by Yoast SEO for optimization. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Hosting is managed via Azure DNS, suggesting reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site uses modern JavaScript libraries like Swiper.js for UI components. Technical debt appears low, but enabling DNSSEC and improving accessibility would further strengthen the technical foundation. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sharedo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sharedo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.