Skip to main content

Security report for sgalinski.de

sgalinski Internet Services · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

sgalinski Internet Services is a specialized digital agency based in Germany focusing on TYPO3 CMS, Symfony-based individual software, Shopware online shops, mobile app development, and SEO/marketing services. The company positions itself as a professional and trusted partner for businesses seeking comprehensive digital solutions, supported by certifications and a strong portfolio of over 350 projects. Their website reflects a mature digital infrastructure with modern technologies and compliance with GDPR through a detailed cookie consent mechanism. The agency maintains active content updates via a blog and provides multiple clear contact channels. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent, though formal security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly documented. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism, good technical implementation, and strong business credibility.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of sgalinski.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sgalinski.de

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
80
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sgalinski.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
161
Employees
0
Customers
156
Third parties
5
Weak passwords
1%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for sgalinski.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector as a small-sized digital agency with a service-oriented business model. It leverages partnerships within the TYPO3 ecosystem and certifications to enhance market trust. Their offerings target businesses needing web development, e-commerce, and mobile solutions. The presence of multiple open job listings indicates growth and operational maturity. Marketing and analytics tools are used responsibly with user consent. The company’s transparent contact information and testimonials further strengthen its market position.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements, indicating a good baseline security posture. However, there is no visible security policy or incident response information, which are important for mature security governance. No security headers were detected in the HTML content, suggesting room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The use of Google Analytics and Google Ads is managed with opt-in consent, supporting privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and adding security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  5. Maintain and regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
sgalinski Internet Services
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
sgalinski Internet Services
Description
Internetagentur spezialisiert auf TYPO3 CMS, Online Shops, Mobile Apps und individuelle Softwareentwicklung mit weiteren Leistungen in Webdesign, SEO und Marketing.
Key services
TYPO3 website development, Shopware online shops, Mobile app development, Individual software with Symfony, SEO and marketing, Corporate design
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
TYPO3, Symfony (mentioned as service)
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong focus on TYPO3 CMS and related technologies.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed cookie categories.
  4. Multiple contact methods clearly presented including email, phone, and contact form.
  5. Active blog with recent posts indicating ongoing content updates.
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Google Ads with opt-in consent.
  7. Good accessibility features including keyboard navigation and accessibility menu.
  8. No evidence of security.txt or explicit security policy pages.
  9. Certifications and partner badges prominently displayed.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS with additional technologies including Symfony for software development, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics, and FontAwesome for icons. The site is well-structured with responsive design and accessibility features such as keyboard navigation and an accessibility menu. Performance is optimized with preloading of fonts and scripts. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph tags, and structured data for news items. The cookie consent system is sophisticated, supporting multiple cookie categories and user preferences. No hosting provider details were found in the content. Overall, the technical implementation is modern, performant, and aligned with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium26 findingsView report
  2. 70/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sgalinski.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sgalinski.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.