Skip to main content

Security report for sfzp.cz

Státní fond životního prostředí ČR · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Státní fond životního prostředí ČR is a Czech government fund established in 1992 that supports environmental improvement projects across the Czech Republic. The organization provides subsidies and loans for energy efficiency, renewable energy, modernization of public transport, and other environmental initiatives. The website reflects a well-established public institution with a strong market position in the environmental sector, targeting municipalities, businesses, and citizens seeking financial support for green projects. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and includes interactive elements such as sliders and calendars. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices and privacy compliance including cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and some security best practices observed, though explicit security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly but does not detract from the site's legitimacy given its official content and government affiliations. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and serves its public service mission effectively.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of sfzp.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sfzp.cz

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
85
Email security
72
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The fund operates as a key government entity financing environmental projects, leveraging EU funds and national programs. Its business model is grant and loan disbursement, with a focus on energy, transportation, and environmental sustainability sectors. The website links to multiple partner programs and official government sites, indicating a broad partnership ecosystem. The content quality and navigation support a wide audience including public authorities and private applicants. The fund's market position is strong as a primary environmental financing body in the Czech Republic, with a large operational scale and long history since 1992. Growth indicators include new funding programs and active communication channels. The presence of official social media and newsletters supports engagement and transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of plugins to prevent user enumeration. Cookie consent and privacy policies align with GDPR requirements. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not evident in the HTML source, representing an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable scripts were detected. The site lacks visible incident response or security contact information, which could enhance readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by implementing recommended HTTP headers and publishing incident response details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish clear incident response and security contact information on the website.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance HTTPS configuration with HSTS preload and stronger cipher suites.
  5. Maintain transparency and trust by updating WHOIS records and ensuring domain registration data is publicly available.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Státní fond životního prostředí ČR
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Státní fond životního prostředí ČR
Description
Státní fond životního prostředí ČR od roku 1992 přispívá na projekty zlepšující životní prostředí v České republice. Poskytuje dotace a půjčky na environmentální projekty, podporuje energetickou soběstačnost, modernizaci dopravy a obnovitelné zdroje energie.
Key services
Dotace na energetické úspory, Podpora obnovitelných zdrojů energie, Financování modernizace městské dopravy, Správa Modernizačního fondu, Podpora programů jako Nová zelená úsporám, Kotlíkové dotace, Norské fondy
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Smart Slider 3, Bootstrap, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of stop-user-enumeration plugin to prevent user enumeration attacks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Smart Slider 3
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WAF or security blocking detected.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual for a government domain.
  4. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. Multiple official social media channels linked.
  6. Use of WordPress CMS with common plugins and scripts.
  7. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities in HTML.
  8. Good SEO and accessibility features observed.
  9. No terms of service page explicitly found.
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies visible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework and jQuery libraries, indicating a modern and maintainable tech stack. Interactive features include Smart Slider 3 for dynamic content presentation and a datepicker calendar for event navigation. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking with cookie consent mechanisms in place. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with semantic HTML and ARIA labels. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in image loading and script management. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sfzp.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sfzp.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.