Skip to main content

Security report for sfzp.cz

Státní fond životního prostředí ČR · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Státní fond životního prostředí ČR is a Czech government fund established in 1992 to support environmental projects through grants, loans, and financial instruments. The website serves as an official portal providing information on funding programs, news, events, and contact details. It targets Czech residents, municipalities, and organizations involved in environmental protection and energy efficiency. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and uses common libraries such as jQuery and Smart Slider 3. It implements HTTPS and security best practices, including cookie consent and privacy policies compliant with GDPR. However, the absence of WHOIS data and explicit security or incident response policies slightly reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site is professional, well-structured, and trustworthy, serving as a key national resource for environmental funding in the Czech Republic.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sfzp.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
85
Email security
72
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The fund holds a strong market position as a primary government entity for environmental funding in the Czech Republic. Its business model revolves around managing and distributing public funds for environmental and energy projects. The website links to multiple partner government and environmental agencies, indicating a broad partnership ecosystem. The presence of social media channels and newsletters suggests active engagement with stakeholders. The fund's operations appear large-scale and well-established, with a focus on transparency and public service. Growth indicators include ongoing funding calls and program updates. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining trust through transparency and compliance, especially given the missing WHOIS data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms. Use of security plugins like stop-user-enumeration indicates awareness of common web threats. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness perception. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy policies and cookie management. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information for security issues.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update accordingly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Státní fond životního prostředí ČR
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Státní fond životního prostředí ČR
Description
Státní fond životního prostředí ČR is a government fund established in 1992 that supports projects improving the environment in the Czech Republic. It offers subsidies, loans, and financial instruments for environmental protection and energy efficiency.
Key services
Grant funding for environmental projects, Loans and financial instruments, Support for energy efficiency and renewable energy, Management of national and EU environmental programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Smart Slider 3, Bootstrap, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (e.g., stop-user-enumeration)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Smart Slider 3
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government environmental fund portal for the Czech Republic.
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured with clear navigation.
  3. Multiple official external links to government and environmental agencies.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  5. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for a government domain.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response contact information.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress).
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. Social media presence on major platforms.
  10. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework and jQuery library, indicating a standard modern web infrastructure. It employs Smart Slider 3 for interactive content and Google Analytics for traffic analysis. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features and SEO optimization. Performance is moderate, with some room for improvement in loading speed. The absence of hosting provider information limits full infrastructure assessment. Technical risks include reliance on third-party plugins and missing WHOIS data which may affect domain legitimacy perception. Opportunities exist to enhance performance and security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sfzp.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sfzp.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.