Skip to main content

Security report for serviceocean.de

ServiceOcean AG · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ServiceOcean AG is a German-based technology company specializing in AI-powered call center software designed to optimize customer service reachability and efficiency. Their flagship product focuses on digital queue management and intelligent call routing to improve inbound call center performance, targeting sectors such as banking, insurance, energy, and e-commerce. The company positions itself as a niche leader in AI-driven inbound call center solutions within German-speaking markets. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with React components, integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance, and demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, raising some concerns about registration transparency, but the professional website content and trust indicators mitigate this risk. Overall, the site presents a credible and professional business presence with room for improvement in security transparency and WHOIS data clarity.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of serviceocean.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching serviceocean.de

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention serviceocean.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for serviceocean.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ServiceOcean AG operates a B2B SaaS business model offering AI-enhanced call center software that addresses high call volumes and complex customer inquiries. Their competitive advantage lies in combining behavioral science with AI to reduce call abandonment and improve service KPIs. The company targets medium-sized inbound call centers in regulated industries, emphasizing cost savings and customer satisfaction. Their marketing ecosystem includes customer testimonials, a business case calculator, and multilingual support via WPML. While no explicit partnerships or subsidiaries are identified, the company maintains a focused product offering with clear growth potential in digital customer service solutions. The absence of public WHOIS data suggests a need for verification of domain legitimacy to strengthen business credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including Content Security Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR compliance. However, the lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for security risks. Recommendations include publishing a security policy, establishing an incident response page or contact, and considering a vulnerability disclosure program to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration details to improve transparency.
  3. Implement a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure program.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet higher standards.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ServiceOcean AG
Description
ServiceOcean AG provides AI-powered call center software focused on improving customer service reachability and efficiency through digital queue management and intelligent call routing.
Key services
Digital queue management, AI-based call routing, Online appointment booking, Inbound and outbound call optimization
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, React (ReactPress plugin), Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, jQuery
Frameworks
WPML (multilingual CMS)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy present
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in German language.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. Professional business site focused on AI call center software.
  4. WHOIS data missing, domain registration status unclear.
  5. Good privacy and cookie compliance with Cookiebot integration.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with React components and Google Tag Manager.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform enhanced with React components via the ReactPress plugin, enabling dynamic features such as a service center calculator. It uses modern web technologies including jQuery and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is multilingual, leveraging WPML for language switching. Performance is moderate with some deferred script loading and lazy loading techniques. SEO is well addressed with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD schema for organization information. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence with opportunities for further optimization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with serviceocean.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review serviceocean.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.