Skip to main content

Security report for sensmax.eu

SensMax · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SensMax is a technology company specializing in the manufacture and provision of IoT sensors and solutions tailored for business users across various sectors such as retail, smart cities, healthcare, and public premises. Their product portfolio includes people counting systems, remote monitoring sensors, customer survey devices, wireless alarm systems, and temperature & humidity monitoring solutions, supported by online reporting software. The company demonstrates a strong international presence with customers in over 50 countries, positioning itself as an innovative and reliable provider in the IoT space. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS and leverages modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and a professional design, although some accessibility features appear basic. Performance is moderate, with a well-structured navigation and clear content presentation. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and employs reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, it lacks visible security headers and does not publish privacy or cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are evident, indicating room for improvement in security governance. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with a solid business foundation but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency to strengthen user confidence and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sensmax.eu

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
25
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SensMax operates in the IoT technology sector, targeting business clients requiring automated data collection and monitoring solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in offering a comprehensive range of devices and software with easy installation and user-friendly interfaces. The business model combines hardware sales with software services, including online reporting and data integration options. The company’s international customer base and partnerships with recognized brands indicate a stable growth trajectory and market acceptance. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding privacy and security policies to align with evolving regulations and customer expectations.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA is implemented to mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security hardening. The lack of published incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies limits transparency and preparedness for security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Compliance gaps exist regarding privacy and cookie policies, which are critical under GDPR and similar regulations. Enhancing these areas will improve the security maturity and reduce potential risks.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and configure essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Develop and make publicly available an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain high standards of user experience and security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SensMax
Description
SensMax develops and manufactures IoT sensors and solutions for business users, including people counting systems, remote monitoring systems, customer survey systems, wireless alarm systems, and temperature & humidity monitoring. They provide low-cost remote monitoring sensors and online reporting.
Key services
People counting systems, Remote monitoring systems, Customer survey systems, Wireless alarm systems, Temperature and humidity monitoring, Online reporting software
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery (implied by $ usage in scripts), Slick Slider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Multiple product and solution categories with detailed descriptions.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. Social media presence on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Contact information is implied via forms and social media but no direct emails or phone numbers found in the HTML snippet.
  8. No visible security headers in provided data; recommend adding.
  9. Good mobile responsiveness and SEO metadata present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system. It integrates modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Slider for interactive elements and uses Google services for analytics and tag management. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading times and accessibility compliance. The technical infrastructure supports a professional presentation of products and services but lacks advanced security configurations and privacy compliance features, which should be addressed to reduce technical debt and regulatory risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sensmax.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sensmax.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.