Skip to main content

Security report for senja.io

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Senja.io is a SaaS platform focused on enabling businesses and website owners to collect, manage, and share customer testimonials easily. The website presents a professional and clean design built on the Framer platform, leveraging modern analytics and marketing technologies such as Google Analytics 4, Facebook Pixel, PostHog, and Segment. The domain is relatively new, registered in 2022, consistent with a startup in the technology sector. Hosting and DNS services are provided via Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and security. However, the website lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. No direct contact information or security policies are published, which may impact business credibility. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are missing, representing areas for improvement.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of senja.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching senja.io

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Senja operates in the technology sector, offering a testimonial management SaaS product targeting businesses that want to leverage customer feedback for marketing. The business model is subscription-based SaaS with a free start option. The website's market positioning emphasizes ease of use and integration with websites. The company appears to be a small startup founded in 2022, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The marketing ecosystem includes affiliate programs (First Promoter) and multiple analytics and retargeting tools, indicating a growth-oriented approach. The absence of detailed company information and contact details limits transparency but is not uncommon for early-stage SaaS companies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection in place. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduce the overall security robustness. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap in security culture and transparency. The extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is not explicitly addressed, and no privacy or cookie policies are found, indicating compliance gaps.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including support and security incident contacts.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to foster transparency and security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The easiest way to collect testimonials and add them to your website. Get started for free.
Key services
Collect testimonials, Manage testimonials, Share testimonials on websites
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics 4, Facebook Pixel, PostHog, Segment Analytics, First Promoter, Pirsch Analytics, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4, PostHog, Pirsch Analytics, Segment Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Twitter Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics 4, PostHog, Pirsch Analytics, Segment Analytics
Marketing tools
RightMessage, GetSiteControl, Segment
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a SaaS platform for collecting and managing testimonials.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the HTML content.
  3. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. Website uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  8. Content is safe and business-oriented.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Framer platform, which provides modern web design capabilities. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing technologies including Google Analytics 4, Facebook Pixel, PostHog, Segment, and Pirsch Analytics, indicating a data-driven approach. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, which offers performance and security benefits. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no accessibility features beyond basic support were detected. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple third-party scripts. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt and security risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium29 findingsView report
  2. 70/100 +4Medium29 findingsView report
  3. 66/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with senja.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review senja.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.