Skip to main content

Security report for seegreen.uk

See Green Media Ltd · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

See Green Media Ltd is a small, Yorkshire-based digital agency specializing in web design, development, hosting, communications, and custom online systems such as CRMs. Established since 2008, the company serves a UK-wide client base with a strong regional identity. Their website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence, showcasing a portfolio of diverse clients and a broad range of services. Technically, the site uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Slick Carousel, FontAwesome, and Google Tag Manager, with a proprietary CMS (SeeCMS). The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with good performance metrics. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the business demonstrates high credibility with certifications, client testimonials, and transparent contact information. WHOIS data is unavailable due to a query on the subdomain rather than the domain, but the website's legitimacy is supported by consistent branding and active content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching seegreen.uk

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

See Green operates as a specialized digital agency targeting businesses and organizations seeking tailored digital solutions, including websites, e-commerce, CRMs, hosting, and communications. Their market position is that of a trusted regional player with a UK-wide reach, leveraging partnerships and certifications to enhance credibility. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on bespoke digital development and ongoing support. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based work, hosting services, and communications solutions. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with recognized technology and infrastructure providers. Growth indicators include a diverse client portfolio and active engagement in local business events. Strategic observations suggest a focus on quality, client satisfaction, and technological adaptability.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. Use of security certifications such as Cyber Essentials indicates adherence to recognized security standards. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is strong with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Tracking tools are used responsibly with clear privacy notices. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from formalized incident response and vulnerability disclosure processes.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response plan or security contact information to improve transparency and readiness for security events.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and tracking tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance monitoring and logging capabilities to detect and respond to security incidents promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
See Green Media Ltd
Registration number
06544298
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
See Green Media Ltd
Description
See Green is a York-based web development company creating more than just websites - they also offer a host of services from design of CRMs and intranets to communications and hosting.
Key services
Websites, Online Systems (CRMs, custom integrations), Hosting, Communications (phone systems, internet connectivity, Google Workspace)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Carousel, FontAwesome, Google Tag Manager, Google Ads Conversion Tracking, 3CX Live Chat, RapidSpike, Lucky Orange
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Google Ads with asynchronous loading
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Lucky Orange, RapidSpike
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Ads Conversion Tracking, Lucky Orange, RapidSpike
Marketing tools
Lucky Orange
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Professional digital agency with clear service offerings and client portfolio.
  3. Strong presence of trust signals including certifications and client testimonials.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools with privacy compliance.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to incorrect WHOIS query on subdomain rather than domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS (SeeCMS) and leverages common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Google Ads, Lucky Orange, and RapidSpike for analytics and performance monitoring. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve user experience. The technical infrastructure appears well-maintained with no visible technical debt or deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and formalize security policies. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified but the site uses CDN and cloud services for content delivery and tracking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with seegreen.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review seegreen.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.