Skip to main content

Security report for securityandtechnology.org

Institute for Security and Technology · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Institute for Security and Technology (IST) is a U.S.-based 501(c)(3) non-profit think tank that unites policymakers, technology experts, and industry leaders to address emerging security challenges through actionable solutions. The organization focuses on critical areas such as AI integration in nuclear command and control, cybersecurity, ransomware mitigation, and resilient infrastructure. IST operates with a collaborative business model emphasizing policy research, project initiatives, events, and publications to influence national security and global stability. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging modern SEO tools like Yoast SEO and analytics services including Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. The site is hosted with GoDaddy as registrar and uses Cloudflare for DNS services. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility features are basic. The site employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration but lacks DNSSEC and some security headers, which are recommended for enhanced security. From a security perspective, IST demonstrates a solid posture with HTTPS enforcement and domain status protections. However, the absence of DNSSEC and explicit security headers, as well as missing cookie consent mechanisms, represent areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is good with a comprehensive privacy policy, though cookie policy and consent mechanisms could be enhanced. Overall, IST's website reflects a professional, trustworthy, and content-rich platform suitable for its target audience of security and technology stakeholders. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, implementing security headers, adding cookie consent mechanisms, and publishing explicit security and incident response policies to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching securityandtechnology.org

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IST holds a strong market position as a specialized non-profit think tank in the security and technology policy domain. Its competitive advantage lies in its multi-sector collaboration, actionable research, and focus on emerging technology risks such as AI and cybersecurity. The business model is centered on thought leadership, advocacy, and convening stakeholders through projects and events. Revenue streams likely include donations and grants, supported by a clear donation page. The target customer segments include government agencies, technology companies, policy makers, and civil society organizations. Growth indicators include active project initiatives, recent funding announcements, and a robust content publishing schedule. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and industry leaders, though no explicit partner domains were identified.

Security posture

IST's security maturity is moderate to high, with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections in place. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are notable gaps that could expose the site to DNS spoofing or clickjacking attacks. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were found, and no vulnerable libraries were detected in the scripts analyzed. Incident response and security policies are not publicly documented, which could impact readiness and transparency. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by the privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing. Overall, the security culture appears professional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy.
  4. Publish explicit security and incident response policies accessible to users and partners.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Institute for Security and Technology
Description
The Institute for Security and Technology (IST) is the 501(c)(3) critical action think tank that unites technology and policy leaders to create actionable solutions to emerging security challenges.
Key services
Policy research and advocacy, Project initiatives on AI, cybersecurity, nuclear command and control, Events and conferences, Publications and insights
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional non-profit think tank focused on security and technology policy.
  2. Content is rich with reports, blogs, podcasts, and event information.
  3. Uses modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected.
  6. No visible phone numbers or physical addresses on main pages; contact primarily via email and contact form.
  7. Social media presence includes Twitter (x.com), LinkedIn, YouTube, and Bluesky.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO for optimization. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing. Hosting is via GoDaddy with Cloudflare DNS services. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic, suggesting room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. The site uses lazy loading for images and WebP formats for performance. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. The absence of DNSSEC and some security headers represents a technical risk. Overall, the infrastructure is stable and suitable for the organization's needs but could be enhanced with additional security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with securityandtechnology.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review securityandtechnology.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.