Skip to main content

Security report for secure-anchor.com

Secure Anchor · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Secure Anchor is a cybersecurity training, keynote speaking, and consulting provider with a well-established online presence dating back to 2005. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and the Divi theme, optimized for mobile devices, and incorporates SEO best practices via Yoast SEO. The technical infrastructure includes Cloudflare DNS and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and domain lock statuses active, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent mechanism via Termly but lacks a dedicated privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the site is trustworthy and serves a professional audience seeking cybersecurity education and consulting services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching secure-anchor.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets organizations seeking to improve cybersecurity awareness and resilience through training and consulting. The business model is service-based, focusing on delivering expert knowledge and keynote presentations. The domain age and registration details support a stable market presence. The website leverages multiple tracking and marketing tools, indicating an active digital marketing strategy. However, the absence of explicit contact information and privacy policies may limit trust for some visitors. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the domain or website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections in place. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security.txt, and published security policies indicates room for improvement in transparency and defense-in-depth. Tracking scripts from third parties are present, which may raise privacy concerns if not properly disclosed. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Incident response readiness and data protection officer information are not publicly available, which could be a compliance gap.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including a security.txt file.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  5. Provide clear company contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Secure Anchor
Description
Secure Anchor provides cybersecurity training, keynote speeches, and consulting services aimed at improving organizational cybersecurity posture.
Key services
Cybersecurity training, Keynote speaking, Consulting services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain locked with clientDeleteProhibited and related statuses
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Google Ads, ZoomInfo Pixel
Marketing tools
Termly Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found
  3. Cookie consent implemented via Termly
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page
  5. Uses multiple tracking pixels for analytics and advertising
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found
  7. Domain is well-registered and locked, but DNSSEC is not enabled
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, supported by Cloudflare DNS and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin. The site uses multiple external scripts for tracking and advertising, which should be managed carefully to maintain privacy compliance. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected, but enabling DNSSEC and improving security headers would modernize the security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with secure-anchor.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review secure-anchor.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.