Skip to main content

Security report for scientificseller.com

Velluto Tech Incubator · E-commerce · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scientific Seller was a niche e-commerce service provider focused on offering tools and support for Amazon FBA sellers. The website content indicates the business is closing down, but historically it served Amazon sellers with specialized software tools. The technical infrastructure is based on a custom CMS with common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel for tracking and marketing. The site uses Cloudfront CDN for hosting and delivers content over HTTPS, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism despite active tracking scripts. Business credibility is moderate with transparent WHOIS data and consistent domain registration since 2015. Overall, the website quality is basic with room for improvement in design, accessibility, and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scientificseller.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention scientificseller.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
683
Employees
0
Customers
683
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
21%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for scientificseller.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the e-commerce sector, targeting Amazon FBA sellers with SaaS tools to optimize their selling ventures. Founded in 2015 and operated by Velluto Tech Incubator in the United States, it maintained a small business profile. The market position was niche, focusing on Amazon seller tools rather than broad e-commerce solutions. Revenue streams likely included subscriptions or licenses for their software tools. The partnership with Velluto Tech Incubator suggests a tech startup ecosystem involvement. The recent closure announcement indicates a business transition or shutdown. The website ecosystem includes standard marketing and analytics tools but lacks advanced compliance or security certifications.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate but with notable gaps. HTTPS is enabled, and the domain status clientTransferProhibited adds a layer of domain security. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options weakens the defense against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are published, limiting transparency and readiness. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts without cookie consent raises privacy concerns under GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or critical vulnerabilities were detected in the content. Overall, the security maturity is basic and would benefit from enhancements in domain security, HTTP headers, and privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and inform users about tracking.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Review and update SSL/TLS configuration to meet modern security standards and improve trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Velluto Tech Incubator
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Velluto Tech Incubator
Description
Scientific Seller provided tools and support for Amazon FBA sellers to enhance their selling ventures. The site recently announced closure but was focused on supporting Amazon sellers with specialized tools.
Key services
Amazon FBA seller tools, Support for FBA ventures
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Cloudfront CDN
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is currently announcing closure of services.
  2. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page; contact form available.
  3. No cookie consent banner despite use of tracking scripts.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  5. Basic SEO and accessibility features present but could be improved.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  7. Use of multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS with jQuery and common analytics/tracking scripts such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Hosting is via Cloudfront CDN, providing global content delivery. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile, but accessibility and SEO are basic. No modern JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms were detected. The HTML structure is valid but minimal in metadata and structured data. There is no JSON-LD or Open Graph metadata beyond basic canonical and title tags. The technical debt includes lack of security headers, no cookie consent, and absence of advanced SEO or accessibility features. Modernization opportunities include adopting a CMS with built-in security and compliance features and enhancing metadata for SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scientificseller.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scientificseller.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.