Skip to main content

Security report for scheduler.ai

Scheduler AI · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scheduler AI by Synapsa is a technology company offering an AI-powered meeting assistant designed to automate scheduling, rescheduling, reminders, recording, and follow-ups. Positioned as a productivity SaaS platform, it targets individuals and teams seeking to reduce manual meeting logistics and improve sales and marketing pipeline efficiency. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with clear service descriptions, client testimonials, and multiple integration options with popular calendar and conferencing tools. Technically, the site is built on Webflow with modern analytics and marketing tools integrated, showing a mature digital infrastructure with good mobile optimization and performance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though lacks explicit security headers and public security policies. WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable, which is typical for SaaS startups but slightly reduces domain trust. Overall, the site is trustworthy, well-designed, and business-focused, with room for improvement in transparency of security and contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scheduler.ai

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention scheduler.ai, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for scheduler.ai right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Scheduler AI operates in the competitive AI scheduling assistant market, leveraging automation to streamline meeting management for sales and marketing teams. Its business model is subscription-based SaaS with tiered pricing plans catering to individuals, small teams, and enterprises. The company emphasizes AI-driven lead qualification, routing, and pipeline management, differentiating itself with multi-channel AI communication (webchat, email, SMS). The presence of client logos and testimonials indicates active market engagement and customer validation. The partnership with Synapsa suggests a broader ecosystem integration. Growth potential lies in expanding enterprise features and deeper CRM integrations. The company currently maintains a small to medium size profile with a focus on technology sector clients.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent management, reflecting awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options indicates potential areas for hardening. No public security policy, incident response, or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which could impact trust for security-conscious clients. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, common for SaaS companies, but limits transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but would benefit from enhanced header implementation and published security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to improve defense-in-depth.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear company contact information including support and security contacts on the website.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Scheduler AI
Description
Your AI copilot that books meetings, proposes times on your behalf, rebooks, reminds, records, and even generates follow-up notes—without the back-and-forth.
Key services
AI meeting scheduling, Proposing meeting times, Rebooking and reminders, Meeting recording and summaries, Follow-up automation, Calendar monitoring, CRM integration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics 4, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, jQuery 3.5.1, Custom Scheduler AI chat widget
Frameworks
Webflow, Flowbase Boosters
Platforms
Google Cloud Storage (for assets), Identity Digital (domain registry)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of consent management for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics 4, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
CookieYes Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features
  2. Strong branding and consistent messaging about AI meeting assistant
  3. Multiple client logos and testimonials enhance trust
  4. Pricing plans clearly detailed with monthly and annual options
  5. Multiple integrations with major calendar and conferencing platforms
  6. Cookie consent banner present indicating privacy awareness
  7. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on site
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, limiting domain trust analysis
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and marketing analytics tools such as Google Analytics 4, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. It uses Flowbase Boosters for UI enhancements like carousels and tooltips. Hosting is via Webflow's platform with assets served from Google Cloud Storage and CDN. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good performance metrics. The technical stack is modern and well-integrated, supporting a seamless user experience. However, the lack of explicit security headers and limited public security documentation represent technical risks that should be addressed to align with enterprise security expectations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scheduler.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scheduler.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.