Skip to main content

Security report for scaleflex.com

Scaleflex · Technology · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scaleflex is a technology company specializing in cloud-based visual asset management solutions for enterprises and SMBs. Their platform integrates digital asset management, visual AI, brand portals, and dynamic media optimization to help businesses efficiently manage and optimize billions of visual assets. The company is positioned as a trusted provider with over 1300 brands relying on their services globally. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure using modern technologies such as Webflow CMS, Weglot for multilingual support, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response details are not publicly disclosed. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, which should be further investigated. Overall, the website is professional, well-designed, and content-rich, targeting enterprise clients seeking scalable visual asset management solutions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scaleflex.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Scaleflex operates in the technology sector, focusing on SaaS solutions for digital asset management and media optimization. Their business model revolves around providing modular, cloud-based services that can be used standalone or integrated. The company targets enterprises, SMBs, and startups across various industries including e-commerce, real estate, finance, and marketing communications. Their competitive advantage lies in combining AI-driven automation with flexible integrations and multi-CDN acceleration. The presence of case studies, testimonials, and partnerships indicates a strong ecosystem and market presence. Scaleflex also invests in multilingual capabilities to serve a global audience. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees and professional services. The company maintains a professional online presence but lacks some transparency in domain registration and direct contact information.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements key security headers such as HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and Content-Security-Policy, indicating a good baseline security posture. Forms are implemented with validation and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. However, there is no publicly available security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are important for enterprise trust and compliance. No direct security contact emails were found. The use of third-party scripts like Weglot and Google Tag Manager is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved with enhanced transparency and formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers for sales and support.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for security vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Scaleflex
Description
Single source of truth for seamless visual asset management to increase your ROI and enhance your brand's visual identity across all channels.
Key services
Digital Asset Management, Visual AI, Brand Portals, Dynamic Media Optimization
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Weglot Translation, Cloudimage Responsive, HubSpot Forms
Frameworks
Weglot Translation Framework
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
HubSpot Forms, Weglot Translation
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong branding and consistent design
  3. Multiple language support via Weglot
  4. Use of modern web technologies and CDN for performance
  5. No direct company emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  6. Contact primarily via forms and support portals
  7. No explicit security or incident response contacts published
  8. No visible privacy or cookie banners but privacy policy is present
  9. WHOIS data missing, domain registration status unclear
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, leveraging modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Weglot for multilingual support. Media assets are optimized and delivered via Cloudimage CDN, enhancing performance and user experience. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. SEO is supported through proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical infrastructure is robust, supporting fast loading times and scalability. However, the reliance on multiple third-party services necessitates continuous security and performance monitoring. There is an opportunity to improve technical documentation and transparency around hosting and security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scaleflex.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scaleflex.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.