Skip to main content

Security report for sbjs.rocks

Sourcebuster · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sourcebuster is a small technology-focused project offering a JavaScript library designed to track the sources of website traffic. The website serves primarily developers and marketers seeking to analyze visitor origins and tailor content accordingly. The business model is based on open source software, with code and documentation hosted on GitHub, positioning it as a niche tool in the web analytics space. Technically, the website is built using React and JavaScript, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. The site structure is clear and content is relevant, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. There is no detected CMS or hosting provider information. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features, which limits its security posture. From a security perspective, the site does not present critical vulnerabilities but lacks HTTPS verification and security best practices such as security headers and privacy policies. The absence of contact information and incident response details further reduces its security maturity. WHOIS data is unavailable due to TLD restrictions, which impacts domain trust verification. Overall, the website is functional and professional for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced security measures, privacy compliance, and transparency to improve trust and compliance. Strategic improvements in these areas would strengthen its market position and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sbjs.rocks

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sourcebuster operates in the technology sector, targeting web developers and marketers who require traffic source tracking capabilities. Its competitive advantage lies in its open source nature and focused functionality. Revenue streams are likely indirect, possibly through consulting or support services, as the product itself is freely available. The project has a small footprint with no evident parent or subsidiary companies. Growth indicators include active GitHub repositories and ongoing maintenance since 2014. The partnership ecosystem is limited to open source community engagement. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding privacy compliance and security features to appeal to enterprise users.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low to moderate. The website lacks HTTPS confirmation and security headers, which are fundamental for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. Incident response readiness is not demonstrated due to missing contact channels for security issues. The security culture appears minimal, with no certifications or formal policies presented. Enhancing these areas is critical to reduce risk and align with regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and verify configuration.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR and other compliance.
  3. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security and abuse reporting channels.
  5. Conduct a security audit of all JavaScript dependencies and update vulnerable libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sourcebuster
Description
JavaScript library to track the sources of your traffic.
Key services
Track sources of website traffic, Show relevant content based on source, Export tracking data to email or CRM
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a technical product site for an open source JavaScript library.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses provided.
  4. No security headers or HTTPS status available from provided data.
  5. Site links externally only to GitHub repositories related to the project.
  6. No advertising or tracking services detected.
  7. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable due to TLD restrictions, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based front end with JavaScript, providing a responsive and user-friendly interface. Performance is moderate but could be improved with optimization techniques. The absence of a CMS suggests a custom or static site approach. SEO and accessibility are basic, indicating room for improvement in metadata completeness and ARIA attributes. No hosting or infrastructure details are available, limiting assessment of backend robustness. Technical debt appears low but the lack of security best practices and compliance documentation represents a risk to long-term sustainability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sbjs.rocks. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sbjs.rocks.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.