Skip to main content

Security report for satoshilabs.com

SatoshiLabs · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SatoshiLabs is a bitcoin-first technology holding company dedicated to empowering financial independence, digital security, and decentralized finance innovation. Established in 2013, the company positions itself as a pioneer with over 10 years of experience and a team of 250+ creators and innovators. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging Webflow and Cloudflare infrastructure, with engaging multimedia content and a focus on self-custody and security solutions. The technical infrastructure is solid, with HTTPS enabled and Cloudflare DNS hosting, though DNSSEC is not enabled, representing a potential security enhancement. The security posture is generally good, but the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and privacy/cookie policies indicates room for improvement in compliance and transparency. User tracking is minimal, using plausible.io analytics, which aligns with privacy-conscious practices. Overall, the website is accessible, well-designed, and trustworthy, but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 20 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching satoshilabs.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SatoshiLabs operates in the technology and finance sectors, focusing on bitcoin and decentralized finance. Their business model centers on innovation in self-custody and digital security products, targeting individuals and organizations valuing financial sovereignty. The company has a medium-sized team and a decade-long market presence, which supports a strong market position. The website content and structure suggest a focus on brand consistency and professional communication. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers but presence of a contact form indicates controlled communication channels. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. The company’s digital footprint is modern and aligns with its market positioning as a technology innovator.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS, which are positive security indicators. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no published security policy or incident response information, which are important for transparency and trust. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The use of minimal tracking via plausible.io is privacy-friendly. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing security and privacy policies, and providing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  3. Add a dedicated security policy page including incident response procedures and contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities and improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SatoshiLabs
Description
Bitcoin-first tech holding focused on self-sovereignty, digital security, and decentralized finance innovation.
Key services
Self-custody solutions, Digital security products, Decentralized finance advancement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, JavaScript, Lottie animations, Spline 3D, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
plausible.io
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found.
  3. Contact information only via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  5. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and Cloudflare DNS.
  7. Minimal user tracking with plausible.io analytics.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and hosted with Cloudflare DNS services, leveraging modern web technologies including JavaScript, Lottie animations, and Spline 3D for interactive content. The site is mobile-optimized with good performance and SEO practices, including proper meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. The site uses plausible.io for analytics, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. No major technical issues or broken elements were detected, but the absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt in security. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and functional but can be improved in security hardening and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with satoshilabs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review satoshilabs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.