Skip to main content

Security report for sainvie.com

Safīra L · E-commerce · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Safīra L is a Latvian food production company specializing in gluten-free and vegan products, including fruit, berry, and vegetable powders, as well as confectionery items. The company emphasizes quality raw materials and healthy eating, targeting health-conscious consumers in Latvia. Their business model includes e-commerce sales and product tastings, positioning them as a niche player in the local healthy food market. Technically, the website is built on the Mozello CMS platform, uses modern JavaScript libraries, and is hosted via Amazon CloudFront CDN, providing moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, but lacks some security headers and explicit privacy policies. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and social media presence support business credibility. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sainvie.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the e-commerce sector focused on healthy, vegan, and gluten-free food products. Their competitive advantage lies in offering high-quality, seasonally preserved powders and confectionery products that cater to dietary restrictions and health trends. Revenue streams likely include direct online sales and event-based tastings. The target audience includes health-conscious individuals, vegans, and those requiring gluten-free diets primarily in Latvia. The company maintains an active social media presence on Facebook and Instagram, enhancing brand visibility. Strategic observations suggest a small-sized enterprise with potential for growth through expanded product lines and improved digital marketing. Lack of detailed company registration data limits deeper business intelligence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and secure login/registration forms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is partial, lacking explicit privacy and cookie policies, though a cookie consent mechanism is present. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are missing, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small e-commerce site but requires improvements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible on the website.
  2. Add essential security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to establish legitimacy and trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Safīra L
Description
Pārtikas ražošanas uzņēmums no Latgales, kas piedāvā bezglutēna vegāniskos produktus, augļu, ogu un dārzeņu pulverus, konditorejas izstrādājumus un degustācijas. Uzņēmums uzsver kvalitatīvu izejvielu izmantošanu un veselīgu uzturu.
Key services
Augļu, ogu un dārzeņu pulveri, Vegāniskie un bezglutēna konditorejas izstrādājumi, Degustācijas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Bannerplay, ResponsiveVideos, Mozello CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure login and registration forms with client-side validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Marketing tools
Engaga
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found, but cookie consent mechanism is present.
  3. Login and registration forms exist but no explicit security policy or incident response info.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, raising questions about domain registration status.
  5. Website uses modern CDN and standard JS libraries.
  6. Social media links to Facebook and Instagram are present and active.
  7. Content is in Latvian language targeting local market.
  8. No phone numbers or email addresses explicitly found in visible content.
  9. Terms of Service page is present and linked in navigation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Mozello CMS with a technology stack including jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, and Amazon CloudFront CDN for hosting and content delivery. The site loads a variety of JavaScript libraries for UI components and analytics, including Google Analytics and Engaga marketing tools. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic SEO optimization. The HTML structure is valid with responsive video support and language localization for Latvian and English. Technical debt is low but the site could benefit from modern security header implementations and improved privacy compliance. No critical technical risks were identified that would impact business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sainvie.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sainvie.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.