Skip to main content

Security report for safra-advokati.cz

Šafra & partneři s.r.o., advokátní kancelář · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Šafra & partneři s.r.o. is a Czech law firm established in 2007 and operating since 2008, providing legal services primarily in Prague. The website presents basic but clear information about the firm, its location, and contact details. The firm targets clients seeking legal advice and services in the Czech Republic, with some content available in Italian. Technically, the website uses standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Google Analytics for visitor tracking. Hosting appears to be through Active24, a Czech hosting provider. The site lacks modern CMS or frameworks and shows basic mobile and accessibility features. Security posture is limited, with no HTTPS enforcement or security headers detected, and no privacy or cookie policies present, indicating compliance gaps. WHOIS data is consistent with the business claims, showing a longstanding domain registration without privacy protection, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional but would benefit from security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of safra-advokati.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching safra-advokati.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm operates in the legal services sector, focusing on providing advokátní kancelář (law office) services in Prague. It has a small business size with a local market focus. The business model is service-based, relying on client engagements for legal advice and representation. The website content and structure suggest a traditional law firm with moderate branding consistency. The absence of social media and limited digital marketing tools indicates a conservative digital presence. The firm uses Google Analytics for visitor insights but lacks advanced marketing or retargeting tools. The company has no visible certifications or security policies published online, which could be a competitive disadvantage in trust-building. The domain age and registrar data support a stable business presence in the Czech market.

Security posture

The website's security posture is basic and shows several areas for improvement. There is no visible HTTPS enforcement or SSL certificate information, which is critical for protecting user data and establishing trust. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are absent, increasing risk exposure. No forms are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking without visible cookie consent mechanisms, raising privacy compliance concerns under GDPR. No incident response or security contact information is provided. Overall, the site is low risk but lacks proactive security measures and compliance transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data collection.
  3. Introduce security headers to mitigate common web vulnerabilities and improve security posture.
  4. Develop secure contact forms with input validation to facilitate user communication while protecting data.
  5. Publish security and incident response policies, including dedicated security contact channels, to enhance trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Šafra & partneři s.r.o., advokátní kancelář
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Šafra & partneři s.r.o., advokátní kancelář
Description
Advokátní kancelář Šafra & partneři s.r.o. poskytuje právní služby od roku 2008, sídlí na adrese Revoluční 1082/8, 110 00 Praha 1 - Nové Město, Česká republika. Kancelář prošla rozšířením personálu a transformací na společnost s ručením omezeným v roce 2011.
Key services
advokátní služby, založení společnosti, smlouvy, právní poradenství
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No forms detected to collect user input

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small Czech law firm with a professional but basic web presence.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. No contact forms present; contact info is provided via email and phone.
  4. Google Analytics is used but no cookie consent mechanism detected.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement detected from provided data.
  6. WHOIS data is consistent and domain age supports legitimacy.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Content is in Czech with some Italian language options.
  9. No social media links found on the site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, without modern frameworks or CMS detected. It uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Hosting is provided by Active24, a Czech hosting provider, consistent with the domain registrar. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks advanced accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The absence of forms limits data collection but also reduces attack vectors. Technical debt is moderate due to outdated charset (windows-1250) and lack of modern web standards. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and enhance security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 47/100High31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with safra-advokati.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review safra-advokati.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.