Skip to main content

Security report for safra-advokati.cz

Šafra & partneři s.r.o., advokátní kancelář · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Šafra & partneři s.r.o. is a small, established law firm based in Prague, Czech Republic, providing a range of legal services including company formation, contract drafting, and legal representation. The firm has been operating since 2008 with a domain registered in 2007, indicating a stable market presence. The website is primarily in Czech with an option for Italian, targeting local and possibly Italian-speaking clients. Technically, the website uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Google Analytics for visitor tracking. Hosting appears to be with Active24, a known provider. Security posture is moderate but lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical for protecting client data and trust. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the site is functional but requires improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching safra-advokati.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm operates in the legal services sector, targeting clients in Prague and surrounding areas. Its business model is professional services with revenue likely from client retainers and legal consultations. The firm has a consistent brand presence and a clear physical location, which supports credibility. The lack of social media presence and limited digital marketing tools suggests a traditional approach to client acquisition. The use of Google Analytics indicates some level of digital maturity. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. Growth indicators are not explicit but the firm's longevity suggests stable operations.

Security posture

The website currently lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are fundamental for secure communications and protection against common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance risk under GDPR. The use of Google Analytics without visible consent mechanisms further complicates privacy compliance. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the firm's ability to handle security incidents effectively. While no explicit vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, the security posture is below industry best practices and requires urgent improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Provide clear security incident response contact information and consider publishing a security policy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Šafra & partneři s.r.o., advokátní kancelář
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Šafra & partneři s.r.o., advokátní kancelář
Description
Advokátní kancelář Šafra & partneři s.r.o. poskytuje právní služby v Praze 1 - Nové Město, působí od roku 2008, s rozšířeným personálem od roku 2011.
Key services
legal advisory, company formation, contract drafting, legal representation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small law firm site with basic but clear content.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. No visible forms on the main page; contact is via email and phone.
  4. Uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking without visible cookie consent.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement visible in provided data.
  7. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is long-established.
  8. Website content is in Czech with some Italian language options.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic web technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript) and uses Google Analytics for tracking. There is no detected CMS or advanced frameworks, indicating a simple static or minimally dynamic site. Hosting is with Active24, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization for mobile or accessibility beyond basic levels. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. The site lacks modern security features and privacy compliance mechanisms, which are critical technical debts. Modernization opportunities include adopting HTTPS, improving mobile responsiveness, and enhancing accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 47/100High31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with safra-advokati.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review safra-advokati.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.