Skip to main content

Security report for rundownstudio.app

Rundown Studio · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rundown Studio is a specialized SaaS provider offering a collaborative platform for show planning, cue timing, and event production management. The company targets production teams across broadcasting, esports, live streaming, and conferences, positioning itself as a niche solution with real-time synchronization and customizable rundowns. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as Astro framework, Font Awesome icons, and integration with analytics and payment platforms like Google Tag Manager, Pirsch Analytics, and Paddle. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although incident response and vulnerability disclosure information could be enhanced. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for performance and SEO.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rundownstudio.app

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates on a subscription and event-based pricing model, appealing to small to medium-sized production teams requiring precise show management tools. It leverages partnerships with Paddle for payment processing and uses analytics tools to monitor user engagement. The company maintains a clear brand identity with consistent messaging and testimonials that reinforce trust. Its market position is focused on providing a better alternative to spreadsheets and generic tools, emphasizing collaboration and automation. The absence of phone contact suggests a primarily digital-first customer support approach.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS, modern security headers, and a cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of explicit incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies represents an area for improvement. The security and compliance page indicates awareness of security best practices, but certifications or formal frameworks are not listed. Overall, the security maturity is good for a SaaS provider of this scale.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit incident response and abuse contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Consider obtaining and displaying recognized security certifications to enhance trust.
  4. Expand privacy compliance details, including data retention policies and user rights information.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain high standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rundown Studio
Description
The rundown tool for collaborative show planning, cueing, and directing. Create and manage rundowns for broadcast, TV, shows, and events with real-time cue timing and team collaboration.
Key services
Rundown creation and management, Automated cue timing, Team collaboration and sharing, Customizable run of show documents
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Astro v5.1.6, Font Awesome 6, Google Tag Manager, Pirsch Analytics, Paddle (payment processing)
Frameworks
Astro
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/opt-out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Pirsch Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-11481361775)
Tracking pixels
Pirsch Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and professionally presented.
  3. Strong focus on collaborative show planning software with clear pricing and feature descriptions.
  4. Good privacy and cookie compliance with visible consent mechanisms.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Astro framework, which supports modern, performant web applications. It uses Font Awesome for icons and integrates with Google Tag Manager and Pirsch Analytics for tracking. Hosting appears to be on Google Cloud Run, indicating scalable and reliable infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility practices. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. Performance is fast with minimal blocking scripts and deferred loading of analytics. Technical debt appears low, but ongoing monitoring is recommended to maintain security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rundownstudio.app. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rundownstudio.app.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.