The website www.runconverge.com presents itself as a marketing measurement platform offering tracking, attribution, and reporting services consolidated into a single solution. The site is built using modern web technologies including Framer CMS, Google Analytics, and PostHog for analytics. The design and user experience are professional and well-structured, targeting marketers and businesses seeking to optimize their marketing measurement efforts. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about the domain's legitimacy and ownership transparency. Additionally, the lack of privacy, cookie, and contact information policies indicates gaps in compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with no explicit security headers detected, and SSL configuration details are unavailable. Overall, while the platform appears functional and professionally presented, the lack of domain registration data and privacy disclosures reduces confidence in its trustworthiness.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention runconverge.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for runconverge.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The business model appears to be a SaaS platform focused on marketing analytics and measurement, targeting digital marketers and businesses. The company leverages modern analytics tools to provide attribution and reporting services. Market positioning details and company size are not disclosed, but the site content suggests a small to medium-sized technology entity. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent company information is available. The absence of contact and compliance information limits insight into operational maturity and regulatory adherence. The platform's competitive advantage may lie in consolidating marketing measurement into a single interface, but lack of transparency could hinder customer acquisition.
Security posture
Security maturity is moderate; the site uses HTTPS and modern analytics but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and contact information for incident response reduces compliance with GDPR and other regulations. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident. Overall, the security posture requires improvement in transparency, policy publication, and header implementation to enhance trust and compliance.
Recommendations
Register and publish accurate WHOIS domain registration information to improve legitimacy and trust.
Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen security posture.
Publish clear contact information including support and security incident response channels.
Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate security maturity.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Description
Manage your tracking, attribution, and marketing reporting in 1 place.
Google Analytics (gtag.js), PostHog analytics, Framer (CMS/website builder), JavaScript
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
50/100
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics, PostHog
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Tracking pixels
PostHog
Marketing tools
PostHog
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
No WHOIS registration data available, indicating possible unregistered domain or privacy restrictions.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found.
Uses modern analytics tools (Google Analytics, PostHog) and Framer CMS.
No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
Content is focused on marketing measurement SaaS platform.
No adult or questionable content detected.
Website design and content quality is good but lacks transparency on privacy and contact info.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on the Framer platform, using JavaScript and modern web fonts. It integrates Google Analytics and PostHog for user behavior tracking. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. No CMS other than Framer is detected. Hosting provider details are not available. Accessibility features are basic but present. Technical debt appears low, but the lack of security headers and privacy disclosures represent modernization opportunities and risk areas.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with runconverge.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review runconverge.com.