Skip to main content

Security report for rumo.rs

Rumors · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rumors is a small, award-winning design and technology studio specializing in web applications, branding, and design strategy. The company serves an international clientele including notable organizations such as Unity Technologies, Microsoft, and NASA JPL, positioning itself as a reputable player in the technology and design services sector. The website content is professional and well-structured, reflecting the company's expertise and market position. Technically, the website uses a minimal tech stack with jQuery 3.3.1 and custom scripts, hosted under a domain registered with Webglobe d.o.o. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and performance but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No CMS or complex frameworks are detected, indicating a lightweight, custom-built site. From a security perspective, the site lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and published security or privacy policies, which lowers its security posture. The contact form includes basic anti-bot measures but no advanced protections. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced security measures, privacy compliance documentation, and improved technical SEO and accessibility to strengthen its digital maturity and risk posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rumo.rs

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rumors operates as a specialized design and technology consultancy with a focus on web applications and branding. Its competitive advantage lies in its award-winning reputation and high-profile client base, which includes major technology and cultural organizations. The business model is service-oriented, targeting organizations needing bespoke design and technology solutions. The company appears to be small in size, founded in 2014, with an international reach. The partnership ecosystem includes well-known clients but no publicly listed subsidiaries or parent companies. Growth indicators are positive given the client portfolio, but the website lacks explicit revenue or operational data.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate with notable gaps. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers exposes the site to potential DNS spoofing and clickjacking risks. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. The contact form uses a honeypot field to reduce spam but lacks visible advanced protections such as CAPTCHA or rate limiting. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are provided, which could delay response to security incidents. Overall, the security culture appears basic and would benefit from formalized policies and technical improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  4. Add an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy with clear contact channels.
  5. Enhance the contact form with CAPTCHA or other anti-abuse mechanisms and ensure HTTPS enforcement site-wide.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rumors
Description
Rumors is an award-winning design and technology studio that places equal emphasis on content, community, and behavior. They specialize in planning, design, and production of web applications, brands and design systems, and design strategy.
Key services
Web applications, Brand and design systems, Design strategy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.3.1
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Contact form includes bot-field honeypot to reduce spam

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional design and technology studio portfolio.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact form present with basic anti-bot measures.
  4. No security or incident response policies published.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond jQuery.
  6. External links to reputable clients and partners.
  7. No advertising or marketing tracking detected.
  8. Domain WHOIS data consistent and domain active.
  9. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with a simple technology stack primarily using jQuery 3.3.1 and custom JavaScript. It does not use a known CMS or modern JavaScript frameworks. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a clean, professional design. Performance is average with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced optimization techniques detected. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no Open Graph or structured data. Accessibility features are minimal. Hosting and domain registration are stable but lack DNSSEC. The technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist in adopting modern frameworks, improving SEO, and enhancing security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rumo.rs. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rumo.rs.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.