Skip to main content

Security report for rudderlabs.com

RudderStack Inc. · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RudderStack Inc. is a technology company specializing in customer data infrastructure, providing a SaaS platform that enables real-time collection, transformation, and delivery of customer event data. Positioned competitively in the customer data platform market, RudderStack offers key services such as event streaming, profiles, reverse ETL, and data governance toolkits. The company targets data, analytics, marketing, and product teams aiming to build smarter customer data pipelines and drive business value quickly. Technically, RudderStack employs a modern web stack based on Next.js and React, hosted on Vercel, with a CMS powered by Sanity.io. The website demonstrates excellent design, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, supported by extensive use of analytics and marketing tools. Security-wise, the site implements strong HTTP security headers and privacy policies, but suffers from an invalid SSL certificate and lacks modern TLS protocol support, which poses a significant risk to secure communications. Overall, RudderStack exhibits a mature digital presence with strong trust signals but requires urgent remediation of SSL and TLS configurations to ensure secure user interactions and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of rudderlabs.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rudderlabs.com

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RudderStack operates in the technology sector, focusing on customer data infrastructure and real-time event data management. Its business model is SaaS-based, offering integrations, data transformation, and governance solutions to enterprise and medium-sized customers. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with major platforms and emphasizes compliance with GDPR, HIPAA, and SOC 2 standards. Growth indicators include multiple customer case studies demonstrating measurable business outcomes and a strong presence in data engineering communities. The company maintains a comprehensive resource and documentation ecosystem, supporting customer success and adoption. RudderStack's competitive advantages include its open architecture, extensive SDKs, and focus on privacy and data control. The partnership ecosystem includes related domains and integrations with cloud and analytics providers.

Security posture

RudderStack's security posture shows a commitment to best practices with the implementation of multiple security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection. The presence of a vulnerability disclosure policy and security page indicates a proactive security culture. However, the invalid SSL certificate and absence of modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and 1.3) significantly weaken the security of data in transit, exposing users to potential interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. The lack of OCSP stapling and session resumption further reduces the robustness of the SSL/TLS implementation. While privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, the absence of a cookie consent mechanism may present compliance risks in certain jurisdictions. Incident response contact channels are defined, but no explicit data protection officer contact was found. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires urgent improvements in SSL/TLS configuration to align with industry standards.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately fix the SSL certificate to ensure valid and trusted HTTPS connections.
  2. Enable and enforce modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) to secure data in transit.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL/TLS performance and security.
  4. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user transparency.
  5. Publish explicit contact information for the Data Protection Officer to improve GDPR compliance and trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack using Next.js and React, hosted on Vercel, with Sanity.io as the CMS backend. It uses advanced front-end techniques including Lottie animations and extensive use of JavaScript SDKs for analytics and marketing. The DNS setup uses AWS Route53 with Google MX records, and SPF and DMARC records are properly configured. Performance is fast with good mobile optimization and accessibility. However, the SSL/TLS configuration is severely lacking, with no valid certificate and no support for modern TLS versions, posing a risk to secure operations. The site integrates numerous third-party analytics and marketing tools, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure but also increasing the attack surface. Technical debt appears low, but security technical risks need addressing to avoid business impact.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100 −3Medium26 findingsView report
  2. 78/100 +6Low25 findingsView report
  3. 72/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rudderlabs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rudderlabs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.