Skip to main content

Security report for rox.com

Rox · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rox is an enterprise-focused AI-powered sales productivity platform targeting Global 2000 companies. The company offers a suite of AI agents and tools designed to automate and enhance the entire customer lifecycle, including sales research, outreach, meeting assistance, and opportunity management. Their platform integrates with existing enterprise stacks and emphasizes fast ROI and full-service deployment. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, with optimized performance and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers in place, though explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly visible. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration transparency, which impacts trustworthiness despite the professional presentation and client references. Overall, Rox presents as a credible enterprise SaaS provider with room to improve transparency and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rox.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rox positions itself as a transformative AI partner for enterprise sales teams, leveraging AI agents to automate revenue operations. Their business model is SaaS-based, targeting large enterprises with complex sales processes. The platform's integration capabilities and focus on AI-native workflows suggest a competitive advantage in the AI-driven sales enablement market. The presence of reputable client logos and case studies indicates established market traction. However, the lack of publicly available company registration details and contact information may limit trust for some prospects. The company appears to be focused on rapid deployment and measurable ROI, appealing to high-performing sales organizations seeking AI augmentation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes standard security headers, indicating a solid baseline security posture. The presence of a dedicated security page suggests attention to security policies and practices. However, the absence of a published vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency in incident handling. No direct security contact emails were found, which could hinder timely incident reporting. The use of third-party analytics and tracking services without visible cookie consent may pose privacy compliance risks under GDPR and similar regulations. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adding explicit incident response channels and improving privacy compliance mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal terms.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Provide explicit security incident contact information and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Improve domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is available or clearly justified if privacy protection is used.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user data handling practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rox
Description
Transform your sales process with Rox. Leverage AI agents to boost productivity, gain actionable insights, and close deals faster.
Key services
Agentic CRM, Revenue operating system, Warehouse-native solution, Customer knowledge graph, Sales automation and AI agents
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS, Web fonts, Video embedding
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security page detailing policies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern frameworks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), FullStory, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, FullStory
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight, FullStory
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional and modern design with clear business focus
  3. Strong emphasis on AI-powered sales productivity for enterprise clients
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found, only contact form
  5. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
  7. Security page present but no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure found
  8. Use of multiple analytics and tracking services without visible cookie consent
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, ensuring good performance and SEO optimization. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. External scripts include analytics and tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight, and FullStory, which enable user behavior analysis but require proper privacy disclosures. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but the site uses CDN and modern deployment practices. No technical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a high-quality user experience with opportunities to improve privacy and security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rox.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rox.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.