Skip to main content

Security report for roq.ad

Roqad · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Roqad is a technology company specializing in identity resolution solutions tailored for the post third-party cookie digital advertising landscape. The company positions itself as an innovative leader serving forward-thinking adtech, martech, and consumer brand clients. Their key services include a probabilistic identity graph, data onboarding, and first-party data collaboration leveraging AWS Clean Rooms. The website reflects a strong commitment to privacy compliance, particularly GDPR and ePrivacy standards, and targets a B2B audience with a focus on improving programmatic advertising performance and audience reach. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins such as Gravity Forms and Yoast SEO, integrated with Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though some security headers could be improved. The presence of multiple trusted client logos and testimonials enhances business credibility. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs privacy-by-design principles. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanism is evident. The WHOIS data aligns well with the website's claims, showing consistent registration information without privacy protection, indicating transparency and legitimacy. Overall, Roqad's website presents a professional, secure, and privacy-conscious digital presence suitable for its target market. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of roq.ad. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching roq.ad

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Roqad operates in the technology sector, focusing on identity solutions for digital advertising in a cookieless world. Their business model is B2B, providing identity graphs and data onboarding services to adtech companies, agencies, DSPs, CDPs, and consumer brands. The company leverages partnerships such as AWS Clean Rooms to offer advanced data collaboration services. Market positioning is strong with emphasis on privacy compliance and innovation. The website showcases a robust partnership ecosystem with major adtech players and highlights growth through new service launches and geographic coverage in North America and Europe. Revenue streams likely include subscription or usage-based fees for identity services. The company targets privacy-conscious clients needing compliant identity resolution solutions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and privacy-by-design principles embedded in their services. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating compliance with consent regulations. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected, which could be enhanced to mitigate common web threats. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from formalized policies and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are in use.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training to foster a strong security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Roqad
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Roqad
Description
Roqad is an identity solutions provider for a post third-party cookie world. Forward-thinking companies in adtech are our customers.
Key services
Identity Graph, Data Onboarding, Probabilistic Identity Resolution, First Party Data Collaboration via AWS Clean Rooms
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, jQuery
Frameworks
Pro Theme Framework (WordPress)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Privacy-by-design principles mentioned
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads Pixel
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via GTM), HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot Forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Strong emphasis on privacy and GDPR compliance
  3. Clear B2B focus on identity resolution for adtech
  4. Multiple trusted client logos and testimonials present
  5. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools
  6. No signs of suspicious or malicious content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a Pro theme framework and child theme customization. It integrates modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, HubSpot forms, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site uses jQuery and Gravity Forms for interactive elements and data collection. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices implemented via Yoast SEO. The technical infrastructure is solid but could be improved by adding advanced security headers and optimizing accessibility. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical stack supports the business needs effectively with opportunities for modernization in security and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 82/100Low24 findingsView report
  2. 82/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with roq.ad. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review roq.ad.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.