Skip to main content

Security report for roq.ad

Roqad · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Roqad is a specialized identity solutions provider focused on enabling digital advertising in a post-third-party cookie world. The company offers advanced identity graph and data onboarding services, leveraging probabilistic identity resolution and partnerships such as AWS Clean Rooms to enhance first-party data collaboration. Their market position is strong within the adtech ecosystem, serving DSPs, CDPs, agencies, and consumer brands with privacy-compliant solutions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools, demonstrating good digital maturity and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, privacy-by-design principles, and consent management, though explicit security policies and incident response channels are not publicly detailed. Overall, Roqad presents a trustworthy and professional online presence aligned with industry best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching roq.ad

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Roqad operates in the technology and media sectors, targeting forward-thinking adtech companies requiring cookieless identity solutions. Their business model is B2B, focusing on identity resolution, data onboarding, and privacy-compliant data collaboration. The company showcases partnerships with major adtech players and emphasizes GDPR and ePrivacy compliance, positioning itself as a privacy-conscious leader. Revenue streams likely include licensing identity graph data and onboarding services. The presence of client logos and testimonials indicates a healthy partnership ecosystem and market acceptance. Growth indicators include recent AWS Clean Rooms integration and active content marketing. Strategic observations highlight Roqad's focus on privacy and adaptability to evolving digital advertising regulations.

Security posture

Roqad demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive privacy compliance, and use of consent management tools like Cookiebot. The website does not expose sensitive data and uses secure form handling via Gravity Forms. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response information limits transparency. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected in the publicly accessible content. Compliance with GDPR and ePrivacy is evident, supported by certifications and TCF vendor status. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly documented, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the security culture appears strong but could benefit from enhanced communication of policies and procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security controls and practices.
  2. Establish and publicize incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy and host a security.txt file for transparency.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Roqad
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Roqad
Description
Roqad is an identity solutions provider for a post third-party cookie world. Forward-thinking companies in adtech are our customers.
Key services
Identity Graph, Data Onboarding, Probabilistic Identity Resolution, First Party Data Collaboration via AWS Clean Rooms
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, jQuery
Frameworks
Pro Theme Framework (WordPress theme)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Privacy-by-design principles
  • Consent management via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form handling via Gravity Forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads, Influ2
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong focus on privacy compliance and cookieless identity solutions
  3. Multiple trusted adtech partners and client logos displayed
  4. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools with consent management
  5. No signs of suspicious or malicious activity
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using a professional Pro theme and child theme, integrating Gravity Forms for data collection and Yoast SEO for search optimization. It employs modern analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, and HubSpot scripts. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the site uses HTTPS with strong SSL configuration. Technical risks are minimal, though reliance on multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security monitoring. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and publish more detailed technical and security documentation to enhance trust and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 82/100Low24 findingsView report
  2. 82/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with roq.ad. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review roq.ad.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.