Skip to main content

Security report for ropnerins.co.uk

Bridge Specialty Group · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bridge Specialty Group is a specialty risk management and insurance services provider, founded around 2020, with a professional online presence built on WordPress and the Genesis Framework. The website is designed with good quality and consistent branding, targeting businesses seeking specialty risk solutions. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging Cloudflare for DNS and hosting, and includes Google Analytics for user tracking with privacy considerations enabled. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partially addressed via a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks a visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ropnerins.co.uk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche specialty risk management sector, likely serving business clients requiring tailored insurance and risk alignment services. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on risk solutions rather than product sales. Market positioning appears as a specialized provider with moderate size and a clear brand identity. The absence of detailed contact information and certifications on the website suggests a focus on direct client engagement rather than broad public marketing. The use of OneTrust and Google Analytics indicates awareness of compliance and marketing analytics. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are disclosed.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection enabled. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency for security issues. Forms and inputs are present but no explicit anti-CSRF or advanced security controls are visible. The cookie consent mechanism is properly implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, security maturity is moderate but could benefit from enhanced policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts and business contact emails/phones.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to foster responsible security reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bridge Specialty Group
Description
Bridge Specialty Group is a business focused on aligning risks with greater reach, likely in the insurance or specialty risk management sector. The website content suggests a professional services firm targeting risk management solutions.
Key services
Risk alignment, Specialty insurance solutions, Risk management services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Genesis Framework (Genesis Sample Theme)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Genesis Framework
  2. Cookie consent implemented via OneTrust
  3. Google Analytics used with restricted data processing enabled
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage
  5. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. No social media links detected in provided HTML snippet
  8. Website content is professional and business-focused
  9. Domain registration is consistent and not privacy protected
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Genesis Framework, using jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing reliable infrastructure and CDN capabilities. The site includes OneTrust for cookie consent management, indicating compliance efforts. Performance is moderate with standard modern web technologies. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported with proper meta tags and hreflang links. There is room for technical improvement in security headers and DNS security. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced with additional security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ropnerins.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ropnerins.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.