Skip to main content

Security report for rogersskiphire.co.uk

Rogers Skip Hire Ltd · Other · United Kingdom

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rogers Skip Hire Ltd is a small UK-based waste management and skip hire service provider operating primarily in West Dunbartonshire and surrounding areas. The company emphasizes environmentally responsible waste disposal with over 20 years of industry experience and owns a waste transfer station in Alexandria. Their services target both business and residential customers, positioning them as a trusted local provider in their sector. The website reflects a professional business presence with clear service descriptions and contact information. Technically, the site uses modern web standards including Google Fonts and FontAwesome icons, and is mobile responsive with a user-friendly navigation structure. However, the site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features and does not include structured data or social media integration. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no security headers or incident response information are present. Privacy and cookie policies exist but are basic and lack explicit GDPR compliance details. The WHOIS lookup failed due to domain registration errors, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional website content. Overall, the website is functional and trustworthy from a user perspective but would benefit from enhanced security practices and domain registration verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rogersskiphire.co.uk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the waste management sector with a focus on skip hire and recycling services. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting local residential and commercial customers. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting their market position as an experienced local provider. The absence of social media and advanced marketing tools suggests a traditional or localized marketing approach. The partnership with a web design agency is evident but no other partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The lack of detailed business registration data and domain WHOIS information limits deeper business intelligence insights. Growth indicators or revenue streams are not disclosed on the site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage but lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The absence of analytics and tracking scripts reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. Privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms are present but basic, with no clear GDPR compliance statements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve incident response readiness and transparency.
  3. Enhance the privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and data protection practices.
  4. Verify and correct domain registration details to resolve WHOIS errors and improve domain legitimacy trust.
  5. Add accessibility improvements and structured data (JSON-LD) to improve SEO and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Rogers Skip Hire Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rogers Skip Hire Ltd
Description
At Rogers Skip Hire Ltd we provide waste and recycling solutions to both business and residential customers throughout West Dunbartonshire and surrounding areas. Registered Waste carrier, fully licensed and insured. Over 20 years experience in the waste industry with own waste transfer station in Alexandria. They recycle waste wherever possible.
Key services
Waste and recycling solutions, Skip hire, Builders merchants
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, FontAwesome, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain registration error.
  3. Website provides clear business contact information and services.
  4. No security.txt or incident response info found.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No social media links present.
  8. Website uses modern fonts and FontAwesome icons.
  9. Mobile menu and responsive design implemented.
  10. No forms detected on the homepage or main navigation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with external resources from Google Fonts and FontAwesome. The site is mobile responsive with a toggleable mobile menu and uses semantic HTML elements. No CMS or hosting provider information is detectable from the source. Performance appears moderate with no heavy scripts or trackers. SEO is basic with meta title and description but lacks Open Graph or structured data. Accessibility features are minimal. No analytics or third-party marketing tools are detected, indicating low technical complexity but also limited digital marketing capabilities. The site would benefit from modern SEO and accessibility enhancements and improved security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rogersskiphire.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rogersskiphire.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.