Skip to main content

Security report for rock-snake.com

Rocksnake GmbH & Co. KG · Manufacturing · Austria

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rocksnake GmbH & Co. KG is a specialized manufacturer and retailer of rescue equipment and sports gear, focusing on innovative, practical solutions for rescue operations, mountain sports, and motorbike/enduro sports. The company emphasizes European manufacturing and sustainability, targeting professional rescue teams and sports enthusiasts. Their website demonstrates a solid digital presence with multimedia content, product showcases, and active social media engagement. Technically, the site uses the Contao CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and includes a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting good privacy compliance. However, the absence of WHOIS data and security headers suggests areas for improvement in transparency and security hardening. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, though domain registration details should be monitored for legitimacy confirmation.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of rock-snake.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rock-snake.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rocksnake operates in a niche market with a strong focus on quality and innovation in rescue and sports equipment. Their partnerships with distributors like Medida and CIR Medical expand their market reach in Europe. The business model combines manufacturing with direct and partner sales, supported by active participation in industry events such as RETTmobil and ICAR. The company leverages endorsements from professionals and integrates customer feedback into product development. Growth indicators include new product launches and international presence. The partnership ecosystem is robust, enhancing brand credibility and market penetration.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage and cookie consent mechanisms. The presence of CSRF token cookies indicates some protection against common web attacks. However, the lack of visible security headers and absence of explicit security or incident response policies are gaps that could expose the site to risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly documented, suggesting room for improvement in transparency and preparedness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to improve transparency and customer trust.
  3. Regularly verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure legitimacy and prevent domain hijacking or impersonation risks.
  4. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine ranking.
  5. Maintain and expand privacy compliance efforts, including clear data retention policies and user rights information.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Rocksnake GmbH & Co. KG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rocksnake GmbH & Co. KG
Description
Rocksnake is a company specializing in rescue equipment and gear for rescue operations, mountain sports, motor and bike sports. They develop innovative, practical products manufactured in Europe with a focus on quality and sustainability.
Key services
Rescue gear and equipment, Mountain sports gear, Motor and bike sports bags and hydration systems, Product customization and modular accessories
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Contao CMS, Rocksolid Slider, Isotope, Colorbox, Matomo Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • CSRF token cookie usage indicated
  • HTTPS implied by base href (https://)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating possible recent registration or data privacy
  4. Strong presence of company contact info and legal pages
  5. Use of modern CMS and JavaScript libraries
  6. Cookie consent and privacy compliance implemented
  7. No security headers visible in provided data
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Contao CMS platform, utilizing jQuery and several JavaScript libraries for sliders, isotope filtering, and lightbox functionality. The site is mobile responsive with good multimedia integration, including embedded YouTube videos. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times and accessibility. The use of Matomo analytics indicates a preference for privacy-friendly tracking. No hosting provider details were identified. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and SEO improvements to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rock-snake.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rock-snake.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.