Skip to main content

Security report for rock-snake.com

Rocksnake GmbH & Co. KG · Manufacturing · Austria

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rocksnake GmbH & Co. KG is a specialized manufacturer and retailer of rescue equipment and sports gear, focusing on innovative, practical solutions for rescue operations, mountain sports, and motorbike/enduro sports. The company emphasizes European manufacturing and sustainability, targeting professional rescue teams and sports enthusiasts. Their market position is that of a niche leader in Europe with strong partnerships and event participation. Technically, the website is built on the Contao CMS platform with modern JavaScript libraries and includes a cookie consent mechanism and HTTPS security. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration transparency. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and CSRF protections, but lacks explicit security policies and incident response contacts. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, but the WHOIS inconsistency slightly reduces trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rock-snake.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in manufacturing and retail sectors, producing specialized rescue and sports equipment. Their business model includes direct sales and partnerships with distributors in Germany, France, and the UK. The presence at international events and partnerships with emergency service providers indicate a strong market presence and growth orientation. The target customers are rescue professionals and sports enthusiasts requiring high-quality, functional gear. The company maintains a consistent brand image and provides comprehensive product information and support services.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. Security best practices include CSRF token cookies and no visible vulnerabilities in scripts. However, the lack of security policy pages and incident response contacts is a gap. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which could be improved. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but could be enhanced with additional transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Add and configure security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to improve domain registration transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization for better user experience and discoverability.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Rocksnake GmbH & Co. KG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rocksnake GmbH & Co. KG
Description
Rocksnake is a company specializing in rescue equipment and gear for rescue operations, mountain sports, motor and bike sports. They develop innovative, practical products manufactured in Europe with a focus on quality and sustainability.
Key services
Rescue gear manufacturing, Sports equipment manufacturing, Product customization, Distribution via partners and dealers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Contao Open Source CMS, Rocksolid Slider, Isotope, Colorbox, Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
Contao CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism with opt-in/out
  • CSRF token cookie present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in German language
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented
  4. Clear contact information with physical address and company email
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and reduces trust
  7. Website uses modern CMS and JavaScript libraries
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. Multiple social media and partner links present
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Contao CMS with jQuery and several JavaScript plugins for sliders and galleries. It includes Matomo analytics for user tracking with a privacy-compliant cookie banner. The site is mobile optimized and has good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, likely due to large images in sliders. No hosting provider information was found. The site lacks some security headers and explicit security documentation. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rock-snake.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rock-snake.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.