Redirects to nomuda.com; the website checks ran on that page, the DNS and email checks on visualfactory.net.
Nomuda · Manufacturing
Low risk. No critical or high findings.
Nomuda is a specialized B2B software provider offering Manufacturing Execution System (MES) solutions through its VisualFactory platform. The company targets complex, high-mix manufacturing environments, aiming to enhance operational efficiency, provide real-time shop floor visibility, and ensure compliance. Their market position is niche but focused, serving manufacturing companies seeking digital transformation in production management. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear messaging tailored to industrial operations. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and jQuery, supplemented by Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. The technical infrastructure supports a stable and professional online presence suitable for their business model. From a security perspective, the site employs HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration and uses cookie consent mechanisms, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of explicit security headers and lack of published privacy policies or incident response plans represent compliance and security gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved to meet higher standards. The overall risk assessment suggests a moderately secure and credible website with minor compliance and security improvements needed. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and terms policies, implementing security headers, and providing clear contact channels for security incidents to enhance trust and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Without HSTS, a visitor who types the address or follows an http:// link makes a first request over plain HTTP, which an attacker on the same network can intercept and keep unencrypted (SSL stripping).
What to do: Send "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains" on HTTPS responses once every subdomain works over HTTPS (use max-age=31536000 alone otherwise).
No Content-Security-Policy is set, so if an attacker manages to inject a script (cross-site scripting), the browser runs it with full access to the page.
What to do: Start with "Content-Security-Policy: object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'; frame-ancestors 'self'" and add a script-src that lists your script origins or uses nonces. Test with a Report-Only header first.
Other websites can load your pages inside an invisible frame and trick visitors into clicking buttons on them (clickjacking).
What to do: Send "Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'self'" (or X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN for older browsers).
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
No link to a privacy notice was found on the scanned page (searched in English and the main EU languages). GDPR Art. 12 and 13 require the notice to be easy to find wherever personal data is collected.
What to do: Link the privacy policy from the footer of every page.
The banner's first layer offers "Cookie Policy (Opens in a new window)", "Accept all cookies", "Confirm choices", "About this tool (Opens in a new window)" but no button to refuse or to accept only necessary cookies. The EDPB cookie banner taskforce, CNIL and the Latvian DVI expect refusing to be as easy as accepting.
What to do: Add a "Reject all" (or "Only necessary") button next to "Accept all", with the same size and prominence.
This scan found 18 issues across 7 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention visualfactory.net, from OffSeq Breach.
1 subdomain affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for visualfactory.net.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with visualfactory.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review visualfactory.net.