Skip to main content

Security report for global-lift.pl

GLOBAL LIFT POLSKA Sp. z o. o. · Manufacturing · Poland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Network security.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GLOBAL LIFT POLSKA Sp. z o. o. is a well-established Polish manufacturer and service provider specializing in elevators, lifts, platforms, and related components. Founded in 1999, the company holds a strong market position with over 25 years of experience and more than 1200 completed projects. Their offerings include design, production, installation, maintenance, modernization, and spare parts sales, targeting residential, commercial, and public sector clients. The website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence, leveraging modern technologies such as WordPress with Elementor, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics. Privacy and cookie compliance are well implemented, with a detailed cookie consent mechanism and a comprehensive privacy policy in Polish. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with relevant regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
59/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      Tracking cookies set before consent

      Observed on the first page load as a new visitor, before any consent choice; Guard does not click the banner. A consent mechanism is present (CookieYes), but these analytics or marketing cookies were already set: Facebook (_fbp); Piwik (_pk_id.1.6e88, _pk_ses.1.6e88).

      What to do: Configure the consent platform to block these tags until the visitor accepts the matching category.

    • High

      Tracking continues after "Reject all"

      Guard opened the site in a separate, fresh browser profile, refused consent ("Odrzuć" button) as a visitor would, then reloaded the page. These analytics or marketing cookies were set after the refusal: Piwik (_pk_id.1.6e88, _pk_ses.1.6e88); Facebook (_fbp). Requests also went to Microsoft Clarity (a.clarity.ms); Facebook (www.facebook.com). Storing them after a refusal has no consent basis under ePrivacy Art. 5(3); the CNIL fined Yahoo EUR 10 million in December 2023 for advertising cookies pl…

      What to do: Tie every tag to its consent category in the consent platform or tag manager so it stays blocked after a refusal, then repeat the check: reject, reload, and confirm no analytics or marketing cookies appear.

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL, MariaDB 5.5.5-10.1.48) is reachable from the internet. The database accepts connections from the whole internet; only its password stands in the way.

      What to do: Block port 3306 at the firewall and reach MySQL through a VPN or private network instead.

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL, PostgreSQL DB 9.3.21 - 9.3.25) is reachable from the internet. The database accepts connections from the whole internet; only its password stands in the way.

      What to do: Block port 5432 at the firewall and reach PostgreSQL through a VPN or private network instead.

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching global-lift.pl

This scan found 21 issues across 7 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
53
Email security
84
DNS health
95
Network security
35
Website hygiene
90
GDPR outside view
59
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention global-lift.pl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for global-lift.pl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing and transportation sectors, focusing on elevator and lift solutions. Their business model combines product manufacturing with value-added services including installation and maintenance, supported by an online store for spare parts. The target audience includes homeowners, businesses, and public institutions in Poland. The company leverages certifications such as UDT and CE to assure quality and compliance. Their digital ecosystem integrates marketing and analytics tools to support customer acquisition and retention. The presence of multilingual support (Polish, Ukrainian, English) indicates a regional market focus with potential expansion. The company maintains a consistent brand image and provides multiple contact channels, enhancing customer trust and engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. It uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam and integrates cookie consent management compliant with GDPR. Tracking and marketing scripts are loaded asynchronously to optimize performance. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not visibly configured, representing an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a public security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing formal security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and incident response procedures to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize risks from vulnerable dependencies.
  5. Enhance monitoring and validation of user inputs on forms to prevent injection attacks and ensure data integrity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GLOBAL LIFT POLSKA Sp. z o. o.
VAT number
PL5222485064
Registration number
016039165 (REGON)
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GLOBAL LIFT POLSKA Sp. z o. o.
Description
Producent wind, dźwigów, platform i komponentów do wind. Firma oferuje projektowanie, produkcję, montaż, serwis, modernizacje i resurs dźwigów. Założona w 1999 roku, dostarcza komponenty dźwigowe oraz wsparcie techniczne dla małych i średnich firm.
Key services
Windy osobowe, Dźwigi elektryczne i hydrauliczne, Windy towarowe i przemysłowe, Platformy dla osób niepełnosprawnych, Montaż, serwis, modernizacje i resurs dźwigów, Sklep online z częściami zamiennymi
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 7.1.3, Elementor 3.21.8, jQuery 3.7.1, GSAP 3.12.2, Splide.js 4.1.4, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, CookieYes Consent Management
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed categories
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
PixelYourSite
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie consent requirements.
  3. Comprehensive product and service offerings clearly presented.
  4. Multiple contact methods available including phone, email, and contact forms.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  7. Good integration of marketing and tracking tools with user consent.
  8. No visible security policy or incident response information publicly available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 7.1.3 with Elementor 3.21.8, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as GSAP and Splide.js for animations and sliders. It uses Google Tag Manager to manage analytics and marketing tags, including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility and SEO optimization, featuring proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. The presence of cookie consent management via CookieYes ensures compliance with privacy regulations. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional user experience and effective digital marketing.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with global-lift.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review global-lift.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.