Skip to main content

Security report for rochen.com

Rochen · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rochen is a web hosting service provider specializing in green hosting solutions with a strong emphasis on performance, uptime, and security. Their offerings include general web hosting and a fast, secure platform tailored for WordPress sites. The company targets website owners and developers seeking reliable and environmentally conscious hosting services. The website is professionally designed, updated recently, and integrates social media channels to engage with customers. Technically, the site runs on WordPress with modern plugins and themes, including Yoast SEO Premium and OceanWP, and uses various marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the active and professional website presence mitigates some risk. Overall, Rochen presents as a credible hosting provider but would benefit from improved transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rochen.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rochen operates in the competitive web hosting market with a niche focus on green hosting, appealing to environmentally conscious customers. Their business model is service-based, offering hosting plans supporting multiple applications, with a particular focus on WordPress. The company maintains active social media profiles, indicating engagement and marketing efforts. The website content is relevant and professional, supporting a medium-sized business profile. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and absence of explicit contact details or compliance policies may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies. The use of advanced SEO and marketing tools suggests a mature digital marketing strategy.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, and uses reputable WordPress plugins that likely include security features. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and there is no public security or incident response policy. The site uses third-party scripts for analytics and advertising, which may introduce privacy considerations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the content analyzed. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly visible, which could hinder timely security issue management. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance security posture.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and customer trust.
  4. Publish explicit security and incident response policies, including contact channels for security incidents.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rochen
Description
Green hosting backed by support you’ll absolutely love. We can help you make almost any type of site load at lightning speeds, ensure it stays online and keep it secure from attacks. Web Hosting Host almost any site. We support many apps. WordPress Hosting We offer a fast and secure platform for WordPress.
Key services
Web Hosting, WordPress Hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Yoast SEO Premium plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, TablePress plugin, OceanWP theme, Chatlio widget
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRoll
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Chatlio live chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected
  2. Professional hosting service provider with focus on green hosting and WordPress
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in provided content
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the analyzed content
  5. Use of multiple tracking and advertising scripts including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel
  6. WHOIS data missing or domain not registered publicly, which is unusual for active business website
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using up-to-date plugins and themes, including Yoast SEO Premium and OceanWP, which support SEO and responsive design. The site loads multiple external resources including fonts from Google Fonts and scripts for analytics and advertising. Performance is moderate with some optimization evident, such as image preloading and responsive styles. Accessibility features are basic but present. The use of multiple tracking and marketing tools indicates a mature digital marketing infrastructure. However, the absence of visible security headers and compliance mechanisms suggests areas for technical improvement. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rochen.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rochen.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.